IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [websec] WGLC feedback for X-Frame-Options

Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> Tue, 29 January 2013 13:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD9D21F8890 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 05:30:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dNiwygfQwiXT for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 05:30:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.checkpoint.com (smtp.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A9321F87D7 for <websec@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 05:30:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DAG-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([194.29.34.150]) by smtp.checkpoint.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0TDU4gr009586; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:30:04 +0200
X-CheckPoint: {5107CB99-1-1B221DC2-2FFFF}
Received: from IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.2.18]) by DAG-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.3.103]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:30:04 +0200
From: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Thread-Topic: [websec] WGLC feedback for X-Frame-Options
Thread-Index: Ac28Q8fEpL3h0k0fQo+0+fl3Ysmd9BBzt9WAAABUV4A=
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 13:30:03 +0000
Message-ID: <4613980CFC78314ABFD7F85CC302772111994B49@IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com>
References: <D418C856-1FA9-4FA3-805D-6A44042B5A36@checkpoint.com> <50994817.1030503@gmx.de> <5107CCA1.2070002@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <5107CCA1.2070002@gmx.de>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [91.90.139.159]
x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful
x-kse-antivirus-info: Clean
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <6E750DDA8F869C4AACF2F8681B236F6C@ad.checkpoint.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [websec] WGLC feedback for X-Frame-Options
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 13:30:15 -0000

Yes. Tobias will submit a revised version soon, incorporating the WGLC comments.

Yoav

On Jan 29, 2013, at 3:20 PM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
 wrote:

> On 2012-11-06 18:25, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> Hi there,
>> 
>> here's my feedback from the HTTP/editorial point of view:
>> ...
> 
> Just checking: is the WG still working on this draft? There doesn't seem to be any activity since October 2012...
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email