Re: [websec] WGLC feedback for X-Frame-Options

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 25 June 2013 08:49 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7AEA21F9E71 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.266
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.266 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.667, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c7mYitmR99Lo for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E46D21F915B for <websec@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.33]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MN7As-1UtZjv3uLw-006go4 for <websec@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:49:47 +0200
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2013 08:49:47 -0000
Received: from p5DD965C6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.1.103]) [93.217.101.198] by mail.gmx.net (mp033) with SMTP; 25 Jun 2013 10:49:47 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+5YP4UxiG5oJ1BuBBzPw9iXjVGGdL5dEtEpSGjns KSEoKGLPbp1hba
Message-ID: <51C959A6.4060208@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:49:42 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
References: <509BE1F0.4010701@KingsMountain.com> <CAC4RtVB73u==2kW8DudYT1AcWxqCEbQw3f_z0zfq5rvQ_OE8-A@mail.gmail.com> <509C07EB.5090806@gondrom.org> <51C53FCD.4000306@gondrom.org>
In-Reply-To: <51C53FCD.4000306@gondrom.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: websec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [websec] WGLC feedback for X-Frame-Options
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 08:49:56 -0000

On 2013-06-22 08:10, Tobias Gondrom wrote:
> Dear websec fellows,
>
> I just uploaded the latest version of XFO including the WGLC feedback I
> received.
> (Apologies for the delay, this happened due to some personal difficulties.)
>
> I hope the new revision is satisfactory and we can go to IETF LC.
> The changes were only very small:
> - the "deprecation of X-" comment is in the introduction section incl.
> reference to 6648
> - and I removed the section 2.2.2 as recommended by Julian.
>
> Best regards, Tobias

Thanks.

A few nits:

In 2.2, I'd replace

    The RFC 5234 [RFC5234] ABNF of the X-Frame-Options header is:

by

    The RFC 5234 [RFC5234] ABNF of the X-Frame-Options header field 
value is:

(emphasis on *value*)

(Also fix remaining instances of "header" to say "header field" for 
consistency).

In the appendices, please fix the W3C references to include the author 
names and the publication status, see 
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2629xslt/w3c-references.html#ref-CR-CSP-20121115> 
and 
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2629xslt/w3c-references.html#ref-WD-CSP11-20130604>.

Best regards, Julian