Re: [websec] [http-auth] re-call for IETF http-auth BoF

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Sun, 12 June 2011 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B5911E80AE; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:18:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.19
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.19 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.409, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bRvrgPpmGwZ3; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:18:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC04811E80AC; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 09:18:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [188.28.0.10] (188.28.0.10.threembb.co.uk [188.28.0.10]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <TfTm4QA-ucVf@rufus.isode.com>; Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:18:48 +0100
Message-ID: <4DF4E6C3.8030206@isode.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:18:11 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
References: <878vtgfbs1.fsf@bluewind.rcis.aist.go.jp> <87hb7zdqjo.fsf@bluewind.rcis.aist.go.jp> <4DF0DB72.9090601@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <4DF0DB72.9090601@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: public-identity@w3.org, websec@ietf.org, http-auth@ietf.org, saag@ietf.org, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
Subject: Re: [websec] [http-auth] re-call for IETF http-auth BoF
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 16:18:50 -0000

Julian Reschke wrote:

> On 2011-06-09 16:31, Yutaka OIWA wrote:
>
>> ...
>> password stealing, session hijack, and phishing.  Currently, the HTTP
>> core protocol only provides basic plaintext password authentication
>> and MD5-based hashed password authentication, both of which are
>> ...
>
> That's kind of misleading; the core HTTP protocol doesn't define any 
> concrete authentication schemes at all; it just offers a framework 
> (header fields, status codes etc).
>
> > ...
>
>> Both BoF and possible future working group expect well coordination
>> with W3C's effort on the related topics.  It shall also be in
>> coordination with related IETF working groups, including websec, abfab
>> and oauth.
>> ...
>
> I believe you need to add HTTPbis.

+1.

I would also add Kitten.