Return-Path: X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C0D721F85D0; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:43:30 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.553 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g4TxM6xYUsnS; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:43:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.checkpoint.com (smtp.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6520221F85C0; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:43:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from DAG-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([194.29.34.150]) by smtp.checkpoint.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1DKhKjC007868; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:43:20 +0200 X-CheckPoint: {511BF6C4-3-1B221DC2-2FFFF} Received: from IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.2.18]) by DAG-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com ([169.254.3.103]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:43:20 +0200 From: Yoav Nir To: Julian Reschke Thread-Topic: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisional Thread-Index: AQHOCiMpQA8EvxXllUyKA9V7P1HJZ5h4Fw6AgAADU4CAAAVSgA== Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 20:43:18 +0000 Message-ID: <4613980CFC78314ABFD7F85CC3027721119A7198@IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com> References: <6.2.5.6.2.20130213113549.0afcce60@resistor.net> <4613980CFC78314ABFD7F85CC3027721119A6FFE@IL-EX10.ad.checkpoint.com> <511BF66F.5070100@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <511BF66F.5070100@gmx.de> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.31.20.231] x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful x-kse-antivirus-info: Clean Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-ID: <28C291D2A2670F4CB6B6B12FEC6A3382@ad.checkpoint.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann , "" , "" Subject: Re: [websec] [Ietf-message-headers] HTTP 'Origin' permanent and provisional X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 20:43:30 -0000 On Feb 13, 2013, at 10:24 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > Well. >=20 > You make it sound as if it's ok to run two different registries with part= ly overlapping values. It's not. It's a bug in the way IANA handles this. T= his is what needs to be fixed. >=20 > Best regards, Julian I don't want to turn this into a process debate, but having a provisional r= egistry like this allows you to create interoperable implementations while = the document is still at draft. I often see a push to get a document publis= hed because we need the IANA assignments for products.=20 Of course they could still do this with a single registry where provisional= entries are somehow marked (with an asterisk?). That way we wouldn't get t= o a situation where we have double entries. Yoav=