IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webtransport] Measuring the friction of Http3Transport

Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Mon, 16 November 2020 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC513A0138 for <webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:06:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2V9aacknqgBf for <webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:06:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52d.google.com (mail-ed1-x52d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F23073A163A for <webtransport@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:05:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id d18so7129680edt.7 for <webtransport@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:05:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=pEi0h0PxZ+3WgWzzF8cUhdz3H8U3iJsgH00I48FoNKA=; b=EYzBGEXO3bCXpt5Uz69ESVUZr+KIYHkwcC7JXo40RLMaBHcQYvGPPfZZdDl3qtgIGx sTaZ0Xdp8o4LKniM4dErqdU620Kb+LPn1FEghxEVYLyhPmjEgPU2Rkq8PZbrtooVWqs0 oz1LVi/+5o81ZJ9KTU+4uJ/vpUpnCIYWnQxper1//SlZjjYP03LLG4WB69tn2VfQNHUW D/DQYNOtYBMx5JdDicsu4jTgDDNzL2UIwATgA5hDD5UlQtBxluqynZ86KmvU4sZ77I3E t9kK1kwR8tuWCtbg0ySzOC1kiOGdd4l8u2ty+oR61zLehVxKbN50cHfQzKZ6qMBtOQHn /BKw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pEi0h0PxZ+3WgWzzF8cUhdz3H8U3iJsgH00I48FoNKA=; b=nvle7oEa3NyzRr0xYKbWTbqw4vLwmkQdwF2L+9L44r4TXpmX/D5WAgNNB9I0u+mzG1 tgynfWj9Gd7Ff2bGJGL6dYVX+CD+w8qE+iQZQzl5XLKiUcYw/Hi5mHBbin1AI6EAfaU4 hT4U+uewRnRS4OoDlTEnyzV2MYFbNvbK84QQsuR5KHgUobYd5kBPHf/rDgyy1JJo0ajE UtL01H2yiu2moZJZRO+kjB1xCwEnqxSZp/H8x3CE8nt7RM9xZHJjqEIi2ydb8KAEBgZv vJJlX15cDJoZyPafmvghETsMT6pf6FPdTb3F8FgwP6YHUiKLDZiU/OkFIvfZDz14A+x/ WyKg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533b8ef7NVQwc/4JcbUP9++BlAbH8QZ7y2306UCUEAih+QupAUb8 cPhHtDvSS0po13gvsjU8iSknmqQ6Cjb9KKvPYGZq5/tN
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxSrelaSyIxBFnqav6jtutk6h2KYMla0Q+aXCyjcY/zB7926Ri4nvjfSot+84/9M3xVFTIbHMnUOSdHYi4/ta4=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:f40a:: with SMTP id r10mr17341273edm.229.1605557132195; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 12:05:32 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALGR9oZo3rPeSund3Te6NgEhfBq5yCYmvdFFtTZqkoZ_Js9AMw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHVo=Zk-1J55MMqRPGFc86k3ncHq9rdw1Qty_CtE4-ezi=C54A@mail.gmail.com> <CALGR9ob-0DNqnJA4OHQinATuzCn+mN8K7dfGHK+FQia99GGDsQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHVo=ZnC0o8XGT-jJ6U6oMEd9AJyx00o1wu7HfG5RZTLhdn=2g@mail.gmail.com> <CAPDSy+4NRvMYUeS2qSkuDCHWic=MkrJFL8_e252z=8KvQ+C5Gw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPDSy+4NRvMYUeS2qSkuDCHWic=MkrJFL8_e252z=8KvQ+C5Gw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 20:05:22 +0000
Message-ID: <CALGR9oYogj62GTx_+nVtEPYJ+ZBz2Lucj-UfD2U4PnmbtQ1L6g@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Luke Curley <kixelated@gmail.com>, WebTransport <webtransport@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000087fc8e05b43ee6e8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webtransport/AFCHg0U_VKFRNcoVMs3mRZ8v_IA>
Subject: Re: [Webtransport] Measuring the friction of Http3Transport
X-BeenThere: webtransport@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <webtransport.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webtransport>, <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webtransport/>
List-Post: <mailto:webtransport@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport>, <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 20:06:12 -0000

On Mon, 16 Nov 2020, 19:37 David Schinazi, <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Hi Luke,
>
> I'm curious, could you elaborate on what these "non-generic modifications
> to the HTTP/3 layer" are please?
>

Yeah this is what I'm trying to figure out. If we just declare pooling as
nice to have but too hard to deploy, then does Http3Transport become a bit
more straightforward to implement?

I'll note that some of the HTTP/3 implementation in familiar with punt the
problem of HTTP semantics to a different part of the code. So the
application-mapping layer is really quite minimal.

Cheers
Lucas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email