IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webtransport] Confirming Consensus on WebTransport protocols

Eric Kinnear <ekinnear@apple.com> Thu, 04 February 2021 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ekinnear@apple.com>
X-Original-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B593A1724 for <webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 11:00:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.35
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.35 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.25, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apple.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JAaJcKkZzPgS for <webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 11:00:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nwk-aaemail-lapp01.apple.com (nwk-aaemail-lapp01.apple.com [17.151.62.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C4EB3A1723 for <webtransport@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 11:00:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (nwk-aaemail-lapp01.apple.com [127.0.0.1]) by nwk-aaemail-lapp01.apple.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 114It2lh008664 for <webtransport@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 11:00:07 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apple.com; h=from : content-type : mime-version : subject : date : references : to : in-reply-to : message-id; s=20180706; bh=mSFCKa+GLK80uXaIN0L7Aj+NfaDxlDXdx/isuGq0+oY=; b=Uf8fxhNJv9iJmgLW8XmCCwr6cIKrh0n4GOve3nnnUsVgZcSiXka27uBVPPlg0D+9383V nW+1AKDoD22zO+1Z+VjJFhtxySVwiZ+Z77pAsAuAtl7TT1S8GMcj34M4m7a0KIHZ9Hxa vhoA9o1RlduZ9FlIf5VJ7h7QuzFehETRQErMVohHvHozpAd/qKUhEZ7RPMbkO9X6rOVT 7PCn7JVxid1Gqw+phEHzBm1eO+yVIro4ICGjZ/N2fktLq2fFYSf00D53ZrHV8fHCn2uJ odNVMgyEd+bIwtBd/GvlFIUNQLbhCqJFS10GecvqFhc+UJvHRjTgTwHuCjO0SsnCfPng LA==
Received: from rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp02.rno.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp02.rno.apple.com [10.225.203.150]) by nwk-aaemail-lapp01.apple.com with ESMTP id 36d794vcgc-4 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <webtransport@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:00:07 -0800
Received: from rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com [17.179.253.14]) by rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp02.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.7.20201203 64bit (built Dec 3 2020)) with ESMTPS id <0QO000AJEQ452790@rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp02.rno.apple.com> for webtransport@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:00:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from process_milters-daemon.rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com by rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.7.20201203 64bit (built Dec 3 2020)) id <0QO000P00Q3TJ900@rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com> for webtransport@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:00:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Va-A:
X-Va-T-CD: 70a0b9fe8493d6f3346f871a1b530886
X-Va-E-CD: 4ed4f33e0687dabe1b06172a3ab84b82
X-Va-R-CD: 4c92cd742ca1261c688b326f07bb1224
X-Va-CD: 0
X-Va-ID: d9667063-7e35-4cc9-8d66-c8918ee14c02
X-V-A:
X-V-T-CD: 70a0b9fe8493d6f3346f871a1b530886
X-V-E-CD: 4ed4f33e0687dabe1b06172a3ab84b82
X-V-R-CD: 4c92cd742ca1261c688b326f07bb1224
X-V-CD: 0
X-V-ID: b6473903-2f2e-43b4-82e0-f096ddd74287
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.737 definitions=2021-02-04_09:2021-02-04, 2021-02-04 signatures=0
Received: from [17.234.20.27] (unknown [17.234.20.27]) by rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.7.20201203 64bit (built Dec 3 2020)) with ESMTPSA id <0QO000TLPQ42A100@rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com> for webtransport@ietf.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:00:03 -0800 (PST)
From: Eric Kinnear <ekinnear@apple.com>
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_91408BB4-23EA-47A0-B836-EA592673E38C"
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.2\))
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:00:02 -0800
References: <CAKcm_gPOS_yjM9P_eRMdkuEB8dZumSHwkkxBkdD6Pi3-AdZ_WQ@mail.gmail.com> <76A1A84F-965E-4B59-A74A-CC6ACBF1C8DE@gmail.com>
To: WebTransport <webtransport@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <76A1A84F-965E-4B59-A74A-CC6ACBF1C8DE@gmail.com>
Message-id: <286E2251-DE83-41C7-995F-9B63079F3722@apple.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.2)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.737 definitions=2021-02-04_09:2021-02-04, 2021-02-04 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webtransport/AYQ6LpL2XPCFskfH59hLRIJce1s>
Subject: Re: [Webtransport] Confirming Consensus on WebTransport protocols
X-BeenThere: webtransport@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <webtransport.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webtransport>, <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webtransport/>
List-Post: <mailto:webtransport@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport>, <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 19:00:10 -0000

I’ve read -03 and I support adoption.

Thanks,
Eric


> On Jan 28, 2021, at 6:31 PM, Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I support adoption.
> 
>> Our next step is to adopt a document that matches this
>> description. The only matching proposal that has been
>> discussed on this list so far is Victor's
>> "WebTransport over HTTP/3" individual draft:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vvv-webtransport-http3 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vvv-webtransport-http3>
>> 
>> We are therefore placing this document in a call for adoption.
>> 
>> Can you please confirm the draft version that you are issuing an adoption call for?
>> 
>> The reason I ask is that a new draft was published on January 27 (just yesterday), while the group discussed an older draft (and even a bit of an editors copy) during the interim meeting. 
>> 
>> Personally, I don't think there is material difference but I think it benefits the group to be precise here.
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Lucas
>> -- 
>> Webtransport mailing list
>> Webtransport@ietf.org <mailto:Webtransport@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport>
>> -- 
>> Webtransport mailing list
>> Webtransport@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport
> -- 
> Webtransport mailing list
> Webtransport@ietf.org <mailto:Webtransport@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email