IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webtransport] Confirming Consensus on WebTransport protocols

David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 28 January 2021 00:33 UTC

Return-Path: <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 180993A0E33 for <webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:33:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HAWtweQTDJiq for <webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:33:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x533.google.com (mail-pg1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6AD33A0DD2 for <webtransport@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:33:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x533.google.com with SMTP id c132so3052073pga.3 for <webtransport@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:33:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ndWNAh2M3mdvJ47KLi9z+NTQoR8fwXzcO27fsNbKftE=; b=hw7wodwDaelday2Vc0cAc2OJJ+LfSZetEmtNTQZSnJzjVKJcXcKolL9qz1iqpo5SnY RQ8ja+wO2IQaDBNUXicb6QUXbiVKNxnG+fFCoRieLNiQsYxGepb/eozVUE17I1O/GwXB 8lh939ZtRHOXYtpPM/Gw38OL1driJvAk/asEHK/K214jEUh6ZBLACXHtYRzshRbICGtQ lfAO4bMJXJHvu6GEF/Fb4J6Gyuk9OOLcdffbHPr3lty63BWlIsSojKGrs4/SxVjmpZoT Ah9nv7F4PdskSc5pPv96W4YGIkpXEoUvtOPOJijhpyBKq3+UMdoAkqt1IUyvTn1tKE/L oSew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ndWNAh2M3mdvJ47KLi9z+NTQoR8fwXzcO27fsNbKftE=; b=aHld5LCDbZ2GLzorf0fg/z75teBPmzFMQnL1V78Im5rqrohYupZWD9Cg6IsaBHUC9n 9vKMYPNmBzKi8ZCup040Rkbf8ZGgjZmtb/s4zfNOKr1WpsDXa+5ZRWcNYLYQ9NsG3US3 rtWDDpw9hqYpnNgYm38b0mvl42FAl2hCL2r6mJpapw/xPT0Jj7mAcqT32Y9fus7pb8pm qew7VdyrEJwjJgGipFFnPoaTFhndZ4ZivXEJF5XCJcQfUOh2QWYIuqkigHtzG4qdzcD5 XVo2qfuH77m8XETI97uMnxTZt555qHJu3JbJc1L6jDB72BBJOlqAEZP5Q0bruAx+Y7G3 O6hA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533DYdAST8BmgI0BSscYYq6dJPJk+y4xOu25nVyDINsMdpBIz9BG HGl8rBx6uCn/7VG8zJVspHTo6lrUrb8OY76oeME=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxyztEGwBZV0clzysbgJvorToSLHLNMmLG+qcDuximkLElGIfBaYxmCZYFvBuqcBKkhgHGQ6csOJEgC+WE4ai4=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:705c:: with SMTP id a28mr14014280pgn.402.1611794023113; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:33:43 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAPDSy+5R=v2GjyJU1o=+Ai0X0iOqJSX787GfLBSUkd9odR++Rw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPDSy+4REQypGw2=_R0OGWPdUL20ZB4gnS2jqnsyU+D1pCscCQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALGR9obEvHogho5vFYkyozudMNOL=FYByvgwUHK22rutMjQwHA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALGR9obEvHogho5vFYkyozudMNOL=FYByvgwUHK22rutMjQwHA@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:33:31 -0800
Message-ID: <CAPDSy+4i30r0Vo==HnvK6hq6+LDakTPHrd=5nLvifcM8RM8hsg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Cc: WebTransport <webtransport@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000032e7cb05b9eb0a21"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webtransport/DcGdLrIk9CZmxOHhy2qyrngRWrs>
Subject: Re: [Webtransport] Confirming Consensus on WebTransport protocols
X-BeenThere: webtransport@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <webtransport.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webtransport>, <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webtransport/>
List-Post: <mailto:webtransport@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport>, <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 00:33:45 -0000

Hi Lucas,

The adoption call covers the latest version as of today, which is -03:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vvv-webtransport-http3-03

David

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 4:25 PM Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi David
>
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2021, 00:17 David Schinazi, <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi WebTransport enthusiasts,
>>
>> This consensus is now confirmed: for the foreseeable future,
>> the WEBTRANS working group will focus on building a single
>> UDP-based protocol for WebTransport, and that protocol will
>> run atop HTTP/3.
>>
>> Our next step is to adopt a document that matches this
>> description. The only matching proposal that has been
>> discussed on this list so far is Victor's
>> "WebTransport over HTTP/3" individual draft:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vvv-webtransport-http3
>>
>> We are therefore placing this document in a call for adoption.
>>
>
> Can you please confirm the draft version that you are issuing an adoption
> call for?
>
> The reason I ask is that a new draft was published on January 27 (just
> yesterday), while the group discussed an older draft (and even a bit of an
> editors copy) during the interim meeting.
>
> Personally, I don't think there is material difference but I think it
> benefits the group to be precise here.
>
> Cheers
> Lucas
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email