IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webtransport] Confirming consensus calls from today's WebTransport interim

Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> Fri, 21 May 2021 00:06 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D853A11FB for <webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 May 2021 17:06:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UdoQne7-0NHs for <webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 May 2021 17:06:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62e.google.com (mail-pl1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 910CB3A11F6 for <webtransport@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 May 2021 17:06:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id s20so10015559plr.13 for <webtransport@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 May 2021 17:06:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=VV5xbwlhpe8plPRnaN4gyluplrXYLbGqYLZ2OX40iYE=; b=sFyskbLdqn3z3KxreYKuLFkpjc1sn7Wl2Pno3uN467d2y0QmAOULPCTwHmEnSoz1Mu 07Jk8twoTYCJsCjS3mXpbuCNPXqqwoZ7KUDNEquTu22R995fkww5a62foGz0tXda9HC/ ysklLha+P3fzsT2nrA0Ny/15+fYt++g8Qxtg/rSKparXKm0bkOCOdUJUlekDqAjz0G2n ymYmnqD/0qEvzCskXQE2S8qrGSsOU0E0FXIOaNXuxTFi0VJjhGVNrq3dScMaLYmUMPiP 1dIcE1UCB8KoibqLTklLTAFvLA+LNA0/dsH6ZfRhcqvswigbmfDzPaRYsFRguIFPm2zq 5kEQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=VV5xbwlhpe8plPRnaN4gyluplrXYLbGqYLZ2OX40iYE=; b=Q1bklNT7fM61hqHHoA989BJTBrwjHLa8hmlb/L3tGEzU1ukY5QgU3JPX2x8dTWSZ8R dCi7+UPdUvFDpCWAN8XX+EX8C9s8W4uDo1whCpwcR+dxqV8gRLVW/r+JOV5A2SkEA9TO lIv49r8j+mj5sER6sU+EE6xikloeNzbzYkM9HvJJEeeNPbmKmKCqDEk5CQsJz3FeD2SV umWGsF7/nnMVB6xg4JHcYa1WK47HYdvpHrwJFrwyyzdmHsym/ABBSryp5qqNlOV6fyp2 Itqzam6SYPrxJz92Lhb0hhKwFkbB8HMq6j6FMjT2JKhn/lyjNKWZyOYxV+vYbsiJIwHM MVzQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531rqKDR2orwHjP4k66RHhScR3b7Hdxb+zc0I9GYBX47HSb3mNmf qXF5wy/3ExnunQVu2uKFxn0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwcfxjc4rH3bYkWeaQMugrBBty4KD08MpWNKffgANcZxQzu89eLbVhLlVrLCBhjtELYf2I4Iw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:4406:: with SMTP id s6mr7429955pjg.93.1621555608189; Thu, 20 May 2021 17:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2600:380:7017:f7be:2d44:82b6:3d23:15ab]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s23sm7446697pjg.15.2021.05.20.17.06.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 20 May 2021 17:06:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 17:06:46 -0700
Message-Id: <C937609F-D165-473B-81BC-37530B8C1E60@gmail.com>
References: <CAPDSy+5s-D7v3jxFmWKD5N-=sVcM_v8ZmB1iVNjZ1ZuHN5n=OQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: WebTransport <webtransport@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAPDSy+5s-D7v3jxFmWKD5N-=sVcM_v8ZmB1iVNjZ1ZuHN5n=OQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18E212)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webtransport/J3pm2UDFxQC7Nn1sjmQkaacEteE>
Subject: Re: [Webtransport] Confirming consensus calls from today's WebTransport interim
X-BeenThere: webtransport@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <webtransport.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webtransport>, <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webtransport/>
List-Post: <mailto:webtransport@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport>, <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 00:06:54 -0000

I am in favor of adoption of draft-kinnear-webtransport-http2 and agree with the meeting consensus on points 1 and 2 as well.

> On May 20, 2021, at 3:27 PM, David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> The chairs have heard interest in building a version of WebTransport
> that works on networks that block QUIC. Additionally, the chairs think
> the WG can work on such a protocol with lower priority than
> WebTransport over HTTP/3 to avoid delaying that deliverable.
> 
> Because of this, in today's WebTransport interim meeting, we had
> three consensus calls, and the chairs were able to determine
> consensus in the room. The chairs would like to confirm the following
> consensus on the list:
> 
> Question 1: Do you believe that the WebTransport WG should start work
> on a version of WebTransport that runs over TCP?
>     1A: Yes, we should build this
>     1B: No, we should not build this
> The consensus was 1A.
> 
> Question 2: Do you believe that the version of WebTransport over TCP
> should be over HTTP/2?
>     2A: Yes, use HTTP/2
>     2B: No, build a custom protocol over TLS/TCP
> The consensus was 2A.
> 
> Question 3: Do you believe that the WebTransport WG should adopt
> draft-kinnear-webtransport-http2?
>     3A: Yes, adopt
>     3B: No, do not adopt
> The consensus was 3A.
> 
> This consensus call (and adoption call) will run for two weeks until
> 2021-06-03. If you disagree with any of the consensus points, please
> let us know by replying to this email. Please add information to explain
> why you disagree.
> 
> Thanks,
> David for the chairs
> -- 
> Webtransport mailing list
> Webtransport@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email