Re: [Webtransport] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on charter-ietf-webtrans-00-00: (with COMMENT)

David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 07 February 2020 09:19 UTC

Return-Path: <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7AF3120043; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 01:19:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mf6hOQ34pZcf; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 01:19:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x232.google.com (mail-lj1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A230120041; Fri, 7 Feb 2020 01:19:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x232.google.com with SMTP id n18so1338354ljo.7; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 01:19:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GK8rVPr4DSE/3Oci2Nuzf3O3cAofSzFIe+e9TF/KT/M=; b=YnbPvlA6LUOazKODjOGpHkm7hxZh1xKQ2sJwFIgijayC1sMLinlH5HJTPq8xeuVXmn m3412UpJq8S0JO94L2stjukeowRWteMhwVEUNQiQfzweIa3jAeG/cIKZy9BJRScQG4n0 CSY0DPwYLPW1uZ/tsRUARSBb/QIIu6jS3cq0J26brhAyOiu+LRn/5D+Kx9tbCottcKXj NWjZCAaHvLbfJIrg7UJFMadEqGpy/86FeLvPo0f0WAJgMw5Q6SlS8bBMEwbYtLpIMG07 Be+wCZ5cGHvQ4skFPuSWWSbfYLWRRuP4KM7O7Tq9JFNPDgk7wDsrF+GYwBamSeH1gd8w SMIg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GK8rVPr4DSE/3Oci2Nuzf3O3cAofSzFIe+e9TF/KT/M=; b=WHOhARrsJMIvpxLjt4Y9CxH7+Lm1e5xdiPKvMjH9vtV+B+5XcHLM+1W1xVKJtvG0CA oON0znJKc4TnOhenqxXeR7v/dMFpeUr3+zzTfL2t3MZPCynb49wyE4avmfymLVkiTJXA YbEhkQfh0v853hWigkDX4R0OprP3vcnOzoAJeLs4w2TTYQ57Tys66HTkqkWRbleyV85U kKy6OpxWRvg/KablXiCLjvvZLcRU0Jn+N2QMZ1aWCJu0kLk3TMTiQRdksQFoRzd95KNO A4WWrIfLO2s2CoyNKyUBAxHTnWWWaKdhwit4oD7yD5IFcoLAKpiJzehb0pLq8GgY2OOk HKcg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUCer7YOn2YCAHiBnwaSCkg7ON5YQ79MCfHcsG9yuqsrzLAm64q sunf1m78/a180HmsvdH8ob/BXrhl37urSnITwRg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxV9z3o2fvtYGABFQBYMZgMOocYDYDglLbDJoLOwhwOmJPro/nRHz4Q+QbJtIShM8GNm28H7zt9+xq1+8S9qsM=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:5854:: with SMTP id x20mr4474920ljd.287.1581067182424; Fri, 07 Feb 2020 01:19:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158100171009.8530.1367848640419613812.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <158100171009.8530.1367848640419613812.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 10:19:31 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPDSy+5nL0_v3OEmtv+-NT26pPLD55gsKw+g2xkaGv3AsoJhkQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, WebTransport <webtransport@ietf.org>, webtrans-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c647dd059df8e3cd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webtransport/hD9RgVRvM0BtNKMM45TryPAIiG0>
Subject: Re: [Webtransport] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on charter-ietf-webtrans-00-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: webtransport@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <webtransport.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webtransport>, <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webtransport/>
List-Post: <mailto:webtransport@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport>, <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 09:19:47 -0000

Hi Ben,

Since we'll be using existing transport/security protocols (QUIC or
TLS/TCP),
we will derive our security level from what they provide.
- QUIC provides the same level as HTTPS over TLS 1.3
- TLS/TCP provides as much as the version of TLS in use.
The working group might decide to require TLS 1.3 or greater
when defining anything over TLS/TCP, but I don't think we need that
in the charter?

David


On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 4:08 PM Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
> charter-ietf-webtrans-00-00: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-webtrans/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Do we have a target security level (e.g., "the same as HTTPS with TLS 1.3")
> that we want this work to provide?
>
>
>