IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webtransport] Confirming Consensus on WebTransport protocols

Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> Fri, 29 January 2021 02:32 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7DFC3A0A8E for <webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:32:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JHoerwrgwL0g for <webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:32:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1029.google.com (mail-pj1-x1029.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1029]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2209B3A0A73 for <webtransport@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:32:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1029.google.com with SMTP id s24so4987032pjp.5 for <webtransport@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:32:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:in-reply-to:to; bh=9NLO5km5fkWe0G0dkfx2WA7SwRUmaohYbWXIJ1RzbTc=; b=bZDjCa6zeSete7gv9AXvUNDRO17zs4Pdaaee4zxQ/rU1Y33O9yFQYcIIffIAmDmrL9 X/IVwe7hayRnODt9LC5Ikb3cvjleIE9eewhMBFJrNmfPuznpvqHbSC8adlg71bctyvCk Rzb7Abh8dqbjJDx+piV9KFRINlsb30JO1io7DeDj41Rw3JvY/nV7JFH6ByOs7X3ELeun LaPINhMwWol6wYepP/OIQJu7emRmUoFfncd4Af+DjgP04OIM4BAe7TnRG1mhxZKx3oTc lGaB2gBcRibW53DXcinsN5AJB+vtpqE6qng9tHJWo/S9KbCtvHawZsJGPN4euqMrUauU YWzg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:to; bh=9NLO5km5fkWe0G0dkfx2WA7SwRUmaohYbWXIJ1RzbTc=; b=jbV7rOBJ4GSyBF55Af30CdzxHoQ9FViiihsfz9wGCFH3DenYydjxwuaOvjdYzfYCqs 9Eflu1n29IGk9l+gaa8VYlsyn2V2J7LOsy8/WV+t7GQxya2FgEsvSb/Vfqh0pcPTrQ8i o550Ue3or5GffDMZy9f89PxT2hPYvjyuKLlnMR32grIUiK1sal0SywNGlMpj62NBodLu QsKlg0Wa+9akFGu/mvDv1fw2EocOTTtpfxyxi1bAHvzx0J7WGTCPJveYueF6HZTL/HXh UC4OkAd3GOKS8494vyzLGsfSxjsx0oZdRGdnQbdAZ3gOdLh4CNZ1XsmTKv1nUdN+C+vP EgFA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Wharra5DIZWeuIoNej3YKUTqxoU2JoDMd1WRs+/I5wcaRUbLv msiwCsK0RvvslZefnVue+CXT/HJatb43/A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwFnupVdaFp3ufZZSSB3VjRDds8RZu9/E6v+9mULQkpTe5JJ28jnNAzcgpO1HXFX4LOxCAcuw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7804:b029:e1:de3:4ae6 with SMTP id p4-20020a1709027804b02900e10de34ae6mr2103159pll.22.1611887518878; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:31:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.116] (c-73-83-125-67.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [73.83.125.67]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p128sm4203980pfp.210.2021.01.28.18.31.57 for <webtransport@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:31:58 -0800 (PST)
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Bernard Aboba <Bernard.Aboba@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-F1173D2B-2A0A-4B43-88DD-212B5E4D4B6E
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:31:57 -0800
Message-Id: <76A1A84F-965E-4B59-A74A-CC6ACBF1C8DE@gmail.com>
References: <CAKcm_gPOS_yjM9P_eRMdkuEB8dZumSHwkkxBkdD6Pi3-AdZ_WQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKcm_gPOS_yjM9P_eRMdkuEB8dZumSHwkkxBkdD6Pi3-AdZ_WQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: WebTransport <webtransport@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18D52)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webtransport/m0CMUyd_26wiHR1YAdiU55tnEFU>
Subject: Re: [Webtransport] Confirming Consensus on WebTransport protocols
X-BeenThere: webtransport@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <webtransport.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webtransport>, <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webtransport/>
List-Post: <mailto:webtransport@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport>, <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 02:32:03 -0000

I support adoption.

>>>> Our next step is to adopt a document that matches this
>>>> description. The only matching proposal that has been
>>>> discussed on this list so far is Victor's
>>>> "WebTransport over HTTP/3" individual draft:
>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vvv-webtransport-http3
>>>> 
>>>> We are therefore placing this document in a call for adoption.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Can you please confirm the draft version that you are issuing an adoption call for?
>>> 
>>> The reason I ask is that a new draft was published on January 27 (just yesterday), while the group discussed an older draft (and even a bit of an editors copy) during the interim meeting. 
>>> 
>>> Personally, I don't think there is material difference but I think it benefits the group to be precise here.
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> Lucas
>> -- 
>> Webtransport mailing list
>> Webtransport@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport
> -- 
> Webtransport mailing list
> Webtransport@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email