IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Webtransport] Confirming consensus calls from today's WebTransport interim

Victor Vasiliev <vasilvv@google.com> Fri, 21 May 2021 16:06 UTC

Return-Path: <vasilvv@google.com>
X-Original-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BFD3A15FC for <webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 May 2021 09:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZiFD120DIvc1 for <webtransport@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 May 2021 09:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AD8D3A15FF for <webtransport@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 May 2021 09:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id r12so21592638wrp.1 for <webtransport@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 May 2021 09:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=019Cyii4ptLdaRaH2rQ5BFv0iovMxO1WoxmIPqcbEy8=; b=V9VFf3uoopKSnoVVs4skcCKScqV//6IOLs5E2HQro4Yro4knfdZVkSn50Z0ITqC6dR LEwhyealKcxzBv64oGZdmvpzHxN3yQ1wvZFqYiso0atO/i2++gTB5FC00YxkhkNfH/vs 2hh9uiTv7yCE597jGmZqIpGJSmuWTo4NT0N95w/lEhux+uALIU4COpGPjc1NkKeqcuDx 0YFeDkboo+2mkSwsrizs+eGGjbHk/OtfaCFv1Q3KfAZe9I7sRdYCz1Hh6SxY52GCEMve 9PUaTbICLRaN3RcZmuFSiInZ69uLCqL/teYUZ+fsrT6937DRN42niifVACZCPtpX+OU4 pqQQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=019Cyii4ptLdaRaH2rQ5BFv0iovMxO1WoxmIPqcbEy8=; b=N9Nnshu8tBH7Mpvhg+VdXmNgFMcYMetXG8LQ0/c5S5H3Kv/B1RIEM3n38e4aILOkrr 2cIZ4lH+y6OvlHwLO3hXlOFQJN0nQXBxAj89eFipMNwLjSMXR2lrEvBtxv4+vw3YVuwB QlJXfTeidQ8BkR9jhZxbYqEhkIqgMt9AgCiFxCz/ZcaFvFtHdLqbVO9w/y3p1/domz0k 8WjSWG2Bp/dvdm42QcKqeAtPBWGri1GLiu9sYc0Ap83he6x9KcTjiapa/fJhCGhK7Cdc MkQ22P2U17MBAaJRhhJSqawZaOKHjNI/3D8Fi+AUX4dGvrmMcFW2xP3+/IkX9+KDdu8g QUAg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532qQb01fWoNzEg1bgYebasKifIyihkUDb0XLTHKaofq2F+WJhjx F3Qu8rNY9NaO+PdlhIyUlepHJUoCx3DG374DOGiWJDz9eYI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy1a2sla3CciE6yKA9rE/NBUupvw52THU8Xk0stytGye+9cdNT+1Znlw6AhPNySGlaanQ97AjwD9ipUHUSMRxI=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1145:: with SMTP id d5mr10644345wrx.404.1621613198350; Fri, 21 May 2021 09:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAPDSy+5s-D7v3jxFmWKD5N-=sVcM_v8ZmB1iVNjZ1ZuHN5n=OQ@mail.gmail.com> <cce29e58-da55-4cc1-b760-4ee1c849c035@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <cce29e58-da55-4cc1-b760-4ee1c849c035@www.fastmail.com>
From: Victor Vasiliev <vasilvv@google.com>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 12:06:27 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAZdMad9hZMutYAWQOO=T+UtV9tuMreHy707JO6qN40k2SVmMQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Cc: WebTransport <webtransport@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a6fcdf05c2d93e27"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/webtransport/wIaOoqntHcaaFGY1swWXYCKaKPk>
Subject: Re: [Webtransport] Confirming consensus calls from today's WebTransport interim
X-BeenThere: webtransport@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <webtransport.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/webtransport>, <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/webtransport/>
List-Post: <mailto:webtransport@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webtransport>, <mailto:webtransport-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 16:06:46 -0000

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 9:37 PM Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:

> I'm opposed to adoption of this document.  I don't believe that it can be
> made so due to some fundamental differences in how HTTP/2 and QUIC stream
> states.
>
> If this problem was acknowledged, then I have every confidence that the
> people listed as authors are able to find a solution.  But generally
> adoption is about the document more than the people.  Adoption means
> agreeing that the document contains approximately the right shape for a
> solution.  I can't agree with that in this case.
>

Hi Martin,

Could you elaborate on the specific differences between HTTP/2 and
QUIC stream state machines that you are concerned about?  The only one I am
aware of is unidirectional versus bidirectional reset, and last time we
discussed this, the easiest solution was to make HTTP/3 behave like HTTP/2,
which would mean there's nothing HTTP/2 draft would do to address that.

Thanks,
  Victor.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email