IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [weirds] feedback on draft-designteam-weirds-using-http

Andy Newton <andy@arin.net> Thu, 17 May 2012 19:07 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@arin.net>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8221B21F86BD for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:07:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.531
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.531 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.068, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c+d9zTrrNaZE for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:07:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.arin.net (smtp1.arin.net [IPv6:2001:500:4:13::33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B0721F86B3 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:07:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by smtp1.arin.net (Postfix, from userid 323) id 9EBB116505F; Thu, 17 May 2012 15:07:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from CHAXCH05.corp.arin.net (chaxch05.corp.arin.net [192.149.252.94]) by smtp1.arin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16285165040; Thu, 17 May 2012 15:07:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from CHAXCH04.corp.arin.net (10.1.30.19) by CHAXCH05.corp.arin.net (192.149.252.94) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.283.3; Thu, 17 May 2012 15:07:09 -0400
Received: from CHAXCH02.corp.arin.net ([169.254.2.4]) by CHAXCH04.corp.arin.net ([10.1.30.19]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Thu, 17 May 2012 15:07:25 -0400
From: Andy Newton <andy@arin.net>
To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Thread-Topic: [weirds] feedback on draft-designteam-weirds-using-http
Thread-Index: AQHNMqKPZqJhq//TLk+q9jbSHfxA95bOVqoAgAATlgCAABUIAIAAAbsAgAAF8QCAABRaAIAAAaeAgAABaQA=
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 19:07:24 +0000
Message-ID: <33CFB1F1-D8D5-4C53-85BD-F86DA266716D@arin.net>
References: <4FB26082.3070800@gmx.de> <9B94D739-E037-4539-82E8-0E79BBFEC543@hxr.us> <4FB520B4.1070803@gmx.de> <18A3C630-38CD-471B-9877-C8D78228B585@lacnic.net> <4FB533CC.8080406@gmx.de> <72D47F61-1972-42EF-A9A2-A2CE8C029A65@lacnic.net> <9566CC8A-04C5-45B3-A05E-69EFFAFCC2DB@arin.net> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F0D5FE445@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
In-Reply-To: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F0D5FE445@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.1.1.56]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <86BDBF39A1EB644C8D0069D270A13D87@corp.arin.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<weirds@ietf.org>" <weirds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [weirds] feedback on draft-designteam-weirds-using-http
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 19:07:27 -0000

Yeah. He also mentioned moving it to an appendix.
I'm just trying to find a compromise.

-andy

On May 17, 2012, at 3:02 PM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:

> Isn't Julian suggesting that we not use the parameter-based approach at all?
> 
> Scott
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: weirds-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:weirds-bounces@ietf.org] On
>> Behalf Of Andy Newton
>> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 2:56 PM
>> To: Arturo Servin
>> Cc: <weirds@ietf.org>
>> Subject: Re: [weirds] feedback on draft-designteam-weirds-using-http
>> 
>> Arturo,
>> 
>> Would you mind us moving and describing the technique in an appendix
>> without reserving a specific parameter?
>> The technique would be to select a parameter unlikely to be used in the
>> specification, such as "tenterhooksarekewl".
>> 
>> -andy
>> 
>> On May 17, 2012, at 1:43 PM, Arturo Servin wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> 	I found the solution interesting to deal with the problem using
>> simple agents, but any decent agent should support adding this header.
>>> 
>>> 	Point taken.
>>> 
>>> .as
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 17 May 2012, at 14:22, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 2012-05-17 19:16, Arturo Servin wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I think it is important to mention it. Otherwise you will end up
>> with
>>>>> different approaches to solve the problem for getting fresh
>> information.
>>>>> ...
>>>> 
>>>> Well, the *right* way is to send Cache-Control.
>>>> 
>>>> "cache busting" using variations in the request-URI is just a hack
>> that happens to work with broken caches.
>>>> 
>>>> Best regards, Julian

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status