Re: [weirds] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt

Michael Young <michael@mwyoung.ca> Tue, 01 May 2012 13:40 UTC

Return-Path: <michael@mwyoung.ca>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72AEF21E80C8 for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 May 2012 06:40:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CisyRppOLbEX for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 May 2012 06:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD9921E809C for <weirds@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 May 2012 06:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iazz13 with SMTP id z13so6799656iaz.31 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Tue, 01 May 2012 06:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to :x-gm-message-state; bh=va2dLkQa2i+hHCo8Z3cMy7bfi2of9kukHmAOPoiBM54=; b=V0sSZbRR18BZnfoXzWP7zzLpnMRkzAxdWEUYJBbM3Y1IFwC0Ovc45O17p/RWNkMahN VR9WLEIjkJl3O9Ofac3/S4PgJgpw1ypewzhTsIsb44Cwvc9AySR2TgnpjdygH3faKGI3 B8CWLCu+VXI0zuD3SQbaK0DMYu6Rgw81xbnP5sGWVlZ8y99gQ1PzoiCxDqoneuZPVMuJ vupHq2YlbwEgV84T+oCfNdx8yOSUDRTwH3IKehJCqVwniKQXy4fExsnCtNu6IxL3224W RnyRiaNEdpRI1j0o1/vaqVhy/LWbUiyqvMkpvlcEwG+jztbQArx/dMD3H95Ng6Di/onJ apOg==
Received: by 10.50.153.201 with SMTP id vi9mr1861958igb.46.1335879658147; Tue, 01 May 2012 06:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.26.20.2] ([207.164.79.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hq3sm43547390igc.0.2012.05.01.06.40.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 01 May 2012 06:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
References: <CBC55ACB.E664%dblumenthal@pir.org>
In-Reply-To: <CBC55ACB.E664%dblumenthal@pir.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Message-Id: <80B012C9-35EE-47F3-807A-587FE5BB4CBB@mwyoung.ca>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9B176)
From: Michael Young <michael@mwyoung.ca>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 09:40:49 -0400
To: Don Blumenthal <dblumenthal@pir.org>
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlWU20Z/O06EyvcPjd0B1uu0J822kC3U580+kqJOfAgdJBczJCZYSyid9HvWcbhUP3WROSS
Cc: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>, "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [weirds] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 13:40:59 -0000

You need a license to operate a Hamm radio or broadcast pretty much anything, this begs the question - should registrants have to apply and receive an ICANN issued ID in order to operate a domain and "broadcast" to the Internet?

Michael Young

M:647-289-1220

On 2012-05-01, at 9:24 AM, Don Blumenthal <dblumenthal@pir.org> wrote:

> I used to be in Internet LE. Out of band may not be sufficient for legal reasons or because of timeliness. It's obviously better than nothing and often all that's available currently but I thought I should clarify the point.
> 
> FWIW, relative old timers in Internet LE miss the days when Whois records often included registrant ID numbers.
> 
> Don
> 
> 
> From: Patrick Vande Walle <patrick@vande-walle.eu<mailto:patrick@vande-walle.eu>>
> To: Dave Piscitello <dave.piscitello@icann.org<mailto:dave.piscitello@icann.org>>, John Levine <johnl@iecc.com<mailto:johnl@iecc.com>>
> Cc: "weirds@ietf.org<mailto:weirds@ietf.org>" <weirds@ietf.org<mailto:weirds@ietf.org>>
> Subject: Re: [weirds] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt
> 
> -1.
> 
> While I can see the usefulness of such an information in specific criminal investigations, I think the registry or registrar could provide this information out of band to the relevant law enforcement authorities, when asked properly.
> 
> As mentioned already, IP addresses are considered as personal data under some jurisdictions.
> 
> If anything, this thread also shows the need to come up with an authentication framework. It is not just a nice to have option, but should be an integral part of the deliverables.
> 
> Patrick Vande Walle
> 
> 
> Dave Piscitello <dave.piscitello@icann.org<mailto:dave.piscitello@icann.org>> a écrit :
> 
> +1
> 
> In a searchable world, sometimes all you have is the IP of the name server that's resolving the malicious/harmful domain. So asking "what other domains host zone files at this IP?", "who registered those domains?", and "what registrar is sponsoring the registrations?" are all useful crumbs that often help you identify names used by in a campaign, or the registrant names used in association with a criminal enterprise.
> 
> On Apr 30, 2012, at 10:46 PM, John Levine wrote:
> 
>>> I find the notion of asking a domain registrar for information about an
>>> IP address to be confusing.  Is the user expecting to know who they
>>> should contact about that IP address, are they expecting to find all the
>>> possible mappings of labels to that IP address , or are they expecting
>>> to have the domain query service perform a reverse l
> ookup
> for them?
>> 
>> For a name registry or registrar, I'd be thrilled to get a list of
>> name servers they know about that resolve to that IP.  A common bad
>> guy trick is to register a bunch of names, stick them all on the same
>> servers, but use a different subdomain name for each one, e.g. foo.biz<http://foo.biz>
>> has name server ns1.foo.biz<http://ns1.foo.biz> and bar.biz<http://bar.biz> has ns1.bar.biz<http://ns1.bar.biz> , but they're
>> really the same IP.
>> 
>> R's,
>> John
>> 
> ________________________________
> 
>> weirds mailing list
>> weirds@ietf.org<mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> weirds mailing list
> weirds@ietf.org<mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds
> 
> --
> Envoyé de mon téléphone. Excusez la brièveté.
> _______________________________________________
> weirds mailing list
> weirds@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds