Re: [weirds] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt

Michael Young <michael@mwyoung.ca> Tue, 01 May 2012 13:29 UTC

Return-Path: <michael@mwyoung.ca>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3777B21E805F for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 May 2012 06:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rcFe9RZ6tVWQ for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 May 2012 06:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D3421E8053 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 May 2012 06:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iazz13 with SMTP id z13so6785831iaz.31 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Tue, 01 May 2012 06:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to :x-gm-message-state; bh=T0rn29pAmrqkhCCxyO9Q+3ESqcP12O4rMii26laIchA=; b=gjuFiKyKcPoflp901ZIe03twwRJpOlSxmT88Cf5h8stXlHcjZzFW14Z04uCBN8Pf2q +H2iLPLQw78ODweOD57WzhNNC1ObO8qXeFkpwRP9FsUNAFZByubpPLyZ4XWxtWDKD7Uc HjNzezsD0rkA/MPrM6vjDjf+HQH2a0kYqcvfdA09Pr42U0fLTV+5OEZd0OIj6yZIKjLe UhqUStYgcEj8N9Mk+ci4ECHhAVbSmbtpcM9WPreSa0PGOIdJB0nRPpI4mYVBywSEr3O5 8p+tL+1L//+lEDVlmN/6u/dzPQQnGJDbSLiiksW4CDh/lk7LVg5bhvn6nwd0Q+t9MHIV pC5w==
Received: by 10.50.6.167 with SMTP id c7mr1886607iga.4.1335878963569; Tue, 01 May 2012 06:29:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.26.20.2] ([207.164.79.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id en3sm42074072igc.2.2012.05.01.06.29.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 01 May 2012 06:29:22 -0700 (PDT)
References: <20120501024631.97808.qmail@joyce.lan> <4F9F9C92.1080002@sidn.nl> <53FAB526-F140-4F16-9E68-395AA94F3AA0@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <53FAB526-F140-4F16-9E68-395AA94F3AA0@icann.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <74615E3A-4433-484A-9E77-CE3314C54946@mwyoung.ca>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9B176)
From: Michael Young <michael@mwyoung.ca>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 09:29:15 -0400
To: Dave Piscitello <dave.piscitello@icann.org>
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkRaPycEhr1IghkaGoMdPa0VB8JHrJhL5b/xarG14AY3M4LBPmKJpud2Ux67KZDHFHafDg2
Cc: "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [weirds] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 13:29:25 -0000

Well registry operators have been listing "bulk Whois" in their to be developed list right in the registry agreements for some time. 

I think what the protocol needs is an option to request a large task ( such as "develop a specified report") and a subsequent notification mechanism to alert the requester the report (or data collection) is ready to retrieve. 

Michael Young



On 2012-05-01, at 8:18 AM, Dave Piscitello <dave.piscitello@icann.org> wrote:

> Well, I think you may have a different notion of how the protocol would be used; in particular, I think you are only considering "public access".
> 
> I'll ask the questions that seems to be unanswered:
> 
> - Are we designing the queries to be only useful for user to name registry, name registrar "web pages"?
> - Do we intend to accommodate automated queries, where software/scripts ask queries using http/https and get JSON/XML whatever responses?
> - Do we intend to accommodate queries that one might make on sets of name registration data that have been collected over time and now form a local data repository?
> 
> I believe the answer is yes to all three. While "public" searchable Whois (or in general query by object/argument) may not initially be permitted by law or policy, shouldn't the protocol take into consideration how researchers, investigators, etc. make use of collected data today - and make it easier and more robust.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On May 1, 2012, at 4:19 AM, Antoin Verschuren wrote:
> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> On 01-05-12 04:46, John Levine wrote:
>>> 
>>> For a name registry or registrar, I'd be thrilled to get a list of 
>>> name servers they know about that resolve to that IP.  A common
>>> bad guy trick is to register a bunch of names, stick them all on
>>> the same servers, but use a different subdomain name for each one,
>>> e.g. foo.biz has name server ns1.foo.biz and bar.biz has
>>> ns1.bar.biz , but they're really the same IP.
>> 
>> Before people are getting too wet erotic area's, I think the request
>> is not about names.
>> For a names registry, only forward lookups are permitted, so query a
>> name, and get back IPs'. Querying for an IP and getting back names
>> from a names registry is, although perhaps technically viable, not
>> permitted by at least European database law.
>> I can imagine that it's cool info though, I would certainly like a
>> query for a postal code and get a list of all Internet resources
>> listed at that physical address. Great marketing info, but not the
>> info a registry is supposed to deliver.
>> 
>> The IP query is for RIR's I suppose. They deliver IP blocks, so
>> querying for an IP there will give you their registration data for
>> that block. No reverse search.
>> 
>> The ID search is something registrars indeed sometimes use to see if
>> the object that exists in their internal DB still exist in the
>> registries DB so they link the correct objects. But also here, it's
>> only a forward object search, no information on what other objects are
>> linked to it in the registry DB.
>> Or to give an example: I want to know when registering a new object if
>> my role-object in the registry DB is still correct, so I query for it
>> by object-ID, that I know by heart or is in my own administration. I
>> then only get back that object, and not all the resources that it is
>> used in.
>> 
>> 
>> - -- 
>> Antoin Verschuren
>> 
>> Technical Policy Advisor SIDN
>> Meander 501, PO Box 5022, 6802 EA Arnhem, The Netherlands
>> 
>> P: +31 26 3525500  F: +31 26 3525505  M: +31 6 23368970
>> mailto:antoin.verschuren@sidn.nl  xmpp:antoin@jabber.sidn.nl
>> http://www.sidn.nl/
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
>> 
>> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPn5ySAAoJEDqHrM883AgnkosIAM1JQE8FE4QSLPy0/hZOiC13
>> pLYr62vN6FZ4KINLHHqrwkvGO97exen8EV/1wG3f8bPNkbZE1104pWJVqh//YSFq
>> 7lH7aCPhi6aZH0hbtNe0HPO8/FLDEfucElqsevsRR/NdarqQ2Ahd+7ul4pCUB3zY
>> R8x4/9MjGaUqpcOx3tglXFqb3sU/W0oFUrIfMwXklI0B7GpcbEvOj3ul1yqYSRmi
>> H0X6vskeo+LmuYXgjWg98JRhdx/Z/s2/WA8A7g0zw8MV3yvQMs1gbrRFu/gZ/KIi
>> GaAU5iTkTool9bggA1vPWWgIxEbkzjt69YSNeAiajW1iKa/tjOeJw2HAmBiTHiA=
>> =TQ+5
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> _______________________________________________
>> weirds mailing list
>> weirds@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds
> 
> _______________________________________________
> weirds mailing list
> weirds@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds