[weirds] Fwd: rechartering

Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us> Tue, 28 July 2015 13:19 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@hxr.us>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF04C1A8AC6 for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:19:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XSf2qBLQ8dwp for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com [209.85.212.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E7D61A8AB3 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so180520415wib.1 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=UsBhyQj8hamJauYaGwp07OzAGV+CpdOsdjNw8VipMZ8=; b=XpilS4gbzTGJ+ti0+dxMgDYRkaHgYn0QdoBnRH11MmY9oZ8EAQmGbu+8t/z+IexdRm V4Pa5oQ8XztUgPdzxUyTNxplDUjU85gHnHgk5oBOhXdtOEe//h/lr4ET/Q08xcFNKWOM /3qCzKGIWGdO8xNdEX8oyJWFFlPLuutVu8vb2OuDG2+9vOqMqWADazO2NxtXC3/lclM4 tuHYKR6VE5dKKZBn+XHsTEKNwqtdwobwSLKgq51VR2dXAf1Wtj0zCaqXMod5sGeiXZg4 A1t0T06zEiK4LlnSNv0ANvkaa3SNXXSezmJAjXnHRUf+6iB9h+MEy1Tf7BqZ65IHDAFK s7rA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnz00q1s6mdpNeoUmL8MugIiS48VdQD0UzNMWT3a0fybkfiEgzuym7fmv+5EJGHSiCbiTAD
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.104.8 with SMTP id ga8mr35024480wib.5.1438089595139; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.249.99 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [2001:500:4:15:2081:b835:d5d5:308]
In-Reply-To: <CAAQiQRdBDKb8NF+d2COxTVCbx7MMtV4dsTRDSqBotq6XroHxBQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAQiQRdBDKb8NF+d2COxTVCbx7MMtV4dsTRDSqBotq6XroHxBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:19:54 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAQiQRd=65H=oTGFEz5ew_+cbKiKZo+xu5Ypb+cf89KtrPK0Pw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
To: "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>, eppext@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04427130794cb1051bef53d9
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/weirds/ARHglXnY_3e9teF_8J3DvBqWlYU>
Subject: [weirds] Fwd: rechartering
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/weirds/>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:19:59 -0000

Since there has been no negative feedback, I'm cross-posting this to WEIRDS
to see what people over there think.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
Date: Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 8:21 PM
Subject: rechartering
To: eppext@ietf.org


All,

I'd like to offer another idea for the rechartering of this working group.
Instead of focusing exclusively on EPP extensions, would it be better if we
rechartered to focus on protocol issues of Internet registries... more
specifically EPP and RDAP.

Given that the constituencies for both have considerable overlap, and there
is already at least one draft covering the mapping between EPP and RDAP and
that there will likely be future drafts where the inputs of EPP and the
outputs of RDAP are correlated, this seems like an easier way forward.

I spoke privately with Scott, Barry, and Pete (the AD behind the chartering
of both EPPEXT and WEIRDS) just to see if I wasn't barking madd, and they
each thought it makes sense.

What are your thoughts and comments about such an approach?

-andy