Re: [weirds] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt

Patrick Vande Walle <patrick@vande-walle.eu> Wed, 02 May 2012 15:02 UTC

Return-Path: <patrick@vande-walle.eu>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E1521F863F for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 May 2012 08:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.285
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.285 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.021, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZM4bEeKxSyEI for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 May 2012 08:02:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lucifer.abilit.eu (lucifer.abilit.eu [85.93.218.208]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE2521F84BF for <weirds@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 May 2012 08:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.isoc.lu (ISOC.abilit.eu [10.10.13.199]) by lucifer.abilit.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70F1F360122 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 May 2012 17:02:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.isoc.lu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20661301621 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 May 2012 17:02:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail2.isoc.lu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.isoc.lu [127.0.0.1]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15347-10 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 May 2012 17:02:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Cioran.vande-walle.eu (141.6-65-87.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be [87.65.6.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: patrick@vande-walle.eu) by mail2.isoc.lu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8913C301619 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 May 2012 17:02:17 +0200 (CEST)
VBR-Info: md=vande-walle.eu; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=vande-walle.eu; s=Sig; t=1335970937; bh=lVXcdxZE//rtK/G6Lzh3HpmPIzNLhWtnSGYrMUngu5E=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=ZQrpoehM3ohymMTsrXBzFvOszPVNRvvvlWFwFBZjcL86BsPQF210VVV4pDQO5c6Kd rZIU+CfehwQ25vhqv05ZI9SjF4iQOLAC4UgZm48GqyW7ppz8mQxa8kr85GpiYk1dle 0/Czkuu0ctNYfprFIlGkpMlHJ7q6CI3xTioa25cs=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Cioran.vande-walle.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EFB823F952 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 May 2012 17:01:44 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4FA14C57.8050608@vande-walle.eu>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 17:01:43 +0200
From: Patrick Vande Walle <patrick@vande-walle.eu>
Organization: My own disorganization
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: weirds@ietf.org
References: <20120502040251.4278.qmail@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20120502040251.4278.qmail@joyce.lan>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070306020407090108000407"
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.4 (mail2.isoc.lu [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 02 May 2012 17:02:17 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.3
Subject: Re: [weirds] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: patrick@vande-walle.eu
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 15:02:42 -0000

On 02/05/12 06:02, John Levine wrote:
>> Querying for an IP and getting back names
> >from a names registry is, although perhaps technically viable, not
>> permitted by at least European database law.
> I know that many people believe that, but I'm fairly sure you're
> mistaken.  (Feel free to provide case law.)
<http://www.mondaq.com/x/162538/Copyright/ECJ+Confirms+That+IP+Addresses+Are+Personal+Data>
As Eric pointed out, there is no need for case law, although you will
find several judgements from the Europe an Court of Justice, national
courts, as well as opinions from the Article 27 Working Party and the
European Data Protection office that will all say that IP addresses are
personal data.  Google's your friend.  Now of course, there is a
difference in concept between an IP address assigned to your home CPE
and one assigned to a  DNS server.  This would require careful analysis.

This begs a question. Being rather new here, I would like to know if the
IETF has a process  in place for WGs to obtain  independent legal
guidance, rather than just engineers playing at being lawyers ? 

Patrick Vande Walle