IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [weirds] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt

Francisco Obispo <fobispo@isc.org> Mon, 30 April 2012 15:57 UTC

Return-Path: <fobispo@isc.org>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE93321F86A3 for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 08:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X21kxmYVKo6z for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 08:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:500:60::65]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EAEB21F8698 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 08:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:d::19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.isc.org", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (not verified)) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B090E5F9BE9; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:57:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fobispo@isc.org)
Received: from fobispo-mbp.lan (c-67-188-135-2.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.188.135.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D3A8216C33; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:57:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fobispo@isc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Francisco Obispo <fobispo@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <265BE093-6BD1-4A5B-AEBB-C36178A0A8CF@hxr.us>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 08:56:05 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <021F0FB3-7F70-4FD1-AC74-C561E96970AD@isc.org>
References: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F0D5F47A3@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F0D5F4898@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <265BE093-6BD1-4A5B-AEBB-C36178A0A8CF@hxr.us>
To: Andy Newton <andy@hxr.us>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Cc: "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [weirds] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:57:58 -0000

On Apr 30, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Andy Newton wrote:

> In general, the broad internet using community doesn't tend to remember their own identifiers in registries. They only know the natural identifiers, such as domain names or IP addresses. So a look up of registrar's by ID is, in my opinion, a feature to make adopting the protocol harder while not doing much benefit for the broader internet public. But host lookups by IP addresses does seem like something an internet user may want to trouble shoot problems.

I agree with this comment, however, what if the same IP is being used by multiple host names?, In my opinion, we should only allow for FQDN and registrar's name.

If we need to provide a ip-to-name or a id search of some sort, we should do so in the 'searchable interface' instead.



Francisco Obispo 
email: fobispo@isc.org
Phone: +1 650 423 1374 || INOC-DBA *3557* NOC
PGP KeyID = B38DB1BE

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status