IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [weirds] Entity name searches

Dave Piscitello <dave.piscitello@icann.org> Tue, 10 November 2015 12:59 UTC

Return-Path: <dave.piscitello@icann.org>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4281ACD97 for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 04:59:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.43
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.43 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dkLOPiPv9Dm8 for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 04:59:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-2.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 517141ACD96 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 04:59:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.25; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 04:59:51 -0800
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1044.021; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 04:59:51 -0800
From: Dave Piscitello <dave.piscitello@icann.org>
To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
Thread-Topic: [weirds] Entity name searches
Thread-Index: AQHRGNV/4iTet5vJAke73jAZnpXocZ6QDfAAgARqPACAAAj1gIAALtUAgAADnoCAAP4mgIAAEg4A
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:59:50 +0000
Message-ID: <0EB10A53-C1B0-48F7-B45D-67F4542087E1@icann.org>
References: <CALRmJyi6i-fo12M0M-gx9Ds50P+0esmX1cRkaFwW_2_L=xcNvg@mail.gmail.com> <CAAQiQRcUvDBLhDEa0ssqmoTPJ18673RiU60mSx7CuxvMq+203w@mail.gmail.com> <CALRmJyixwJZ+pGRKjg6bSpbZEYkqqO3=-Zc46cBzfj8n6Uvv+w@mail.gmail.com> <DECCCEF3-9870-4599-BFD7-03200F20CEA3@icann.org> <CAAQiQRf3tZ7Vt2Xu79a6vb+hr9=FxsJRkHKOFP8SKaV_C1zJ-Q@mail.gmail.com> <29946A12-95CF-451E-8B7E-48A7EA51D62F@icann.org> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A0DED19@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
In-Reply-To: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F4A0DED19@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-pgp-agent: GPGMail 2.5.1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.47.236]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_ED003F77-3A6C-4A9B-9548-9E6CA29FEAA7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/weirds/U61fSsnFtDj3ZsG_ZQXXbglpRZU>
Cc: Brian Mountford <mountford@google.com>, Justine Tunney <jart@google.com>, "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [weirds] Entity name searches
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/weirds/>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 12:59:55 -0000

This is only one of the big challenges and my experience is that authorization policies in a multi-stakeholder community are difficult agreements to reach.

And there are several degrees of separation between polices and enforcement through contracts.

However, I’ll defer to your view and wish you well in the endeavor.

For now, however, I’ll declare success if I can get sufficiently unfettered access to RDAP to be able to collect registration data and search/parse it once I have it.

> On Nov 10, 2015, at 6:55 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck@verisign.com> wrote:
> 
> The biggest challenge is in developing the authorization policies,

v2.1.10 | Report a Bug | By Email