[weirds] RDAP registrar entities
Brian Mountford <mountford@google.com> Fri, 30 October 2015 16:02 UTC
Return-Path: <mountford@google.com>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5921B2D53 for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VEF6Yoki-6pk for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x235.google.com (mail-vk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD7041A883E for <weirds@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vkex70 with SMTP id x70so49850466vke.3 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=rbXAslsA7l6CXRBFAZkffJfm2ook+lBYYrzEDnc9rJ8=; b=WV5RHcEp6Q7jlsKSr7My+4nRFEcaCkmKSxa6JkyRsWXGeaguhHEdJ7R/grpIIt9dqs wOXknQsf7uO5Is1Zc7erVAMGjoU2ccm5LV3CUmxUg9LpwFwYmmXRIT8kJ1p4Cx+/swKq i+j4f8HAEnzxuFFh+5IqPHG1l9qJU0cXlnOjQfq4uxKLom+G05F7EY2b5FWDRwwSwZif gDRvW10Y4KBWt3/vLbl+1l5sFNZAiShBaFvUIbZo3Yb9+JkHY9W+PPh4iGpmhzhvpPJ+ rzqLbxK/la+pKaSQIe90nudfoO6TQs55J7pyie2UzHqltumQnqjGmghS8SaBiE4++CU6 J2QQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=rbXAslsA7l6CXRBFAZkffJfm2ook+lBYYrzEDnc9rJ8=; b=Ek4z6groSwFb+6EFMhrTMTtgQZ78WZ4gtakFxnRvWZjDa1rlcsNjswzf8H3pxS10VK horO03I7xbFg1knBUk00/gKaYvcnHzOwLzXY7fw0E06WuYVtlhDEhq8bpLzH04IJSrTQ eq7UalEgGtg5T1YlIcOW2JPkvvURszFPCrDzgQjNCmt8vcghM8akFPCNbMUc368bd1VQ /Q0i2KuvI0mB90+3WbMqvD+Ann9XZ6IDMtL3Shy4fCmUNy7iYqPR13q59NEyaczAD4TT RQ0OR8gvK0PXvCwI/ZYjwakGrCZYHTgQM3AWmrXQCJItv5AZciwYO91PPsSW5ZCxiHp/ e+/Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnr11xO9ZuPsILP1y7DU3X8+VcVKCNbzN1Z9xCfnPRAGaUpUXoATxHSM1mncjVsdLJGD5Du
X-Received: by 10.31.138.72 with SMTP id m69mr5868282vkd.66.1446220920770; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.230.68 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Brian Mountford <mountford@google.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 12:01:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CALRmJyhTqpJ4NGhrZ4kWv9oenwpA6X=7Ld2S_dg5KGXFeTs8_g@mail.gmail.com>
To: weirds@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11456322400c940523548cd9"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/weirds/Wwqgp8sVZTq471vOVILL_JAH3Ak>
Subject: [weirds] RDAP registrar entities
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/weirds/>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:02:05 -0000
Hello, all. I have been directed to this list as a possible place to get some RDAP questions answered. Here's one, regarding RDAP entities, which appear to include both contacts and registrars. In our system internally, the two are quite separate, and in fact registrars can themselves have multiple contacts, just as a domain can. So I'm trying to figure out how to fit the data into the RDAP format. First of all, is there a reason why registrars and contacts were lumped together into one type of thing? Just curious. The example in RFC 7483 for a registrar included several addresses and phone numbers, as if the sample registrar also had contacts associated with it. But none of the addresses and phone numbers were marked with anything that would distinguish between the contacts (e.g. a type of "admin", "tech", etc.). Should we just take all the data we have for a registrar, including all addresses of associated contacts, and throw them into the entity JSON object one after another? Can we mark them with the contact role as a type? Or does type always need to be "home" or "work"? RFC 7482 describes searching for an entity by name. In the case of our registrars, we have two things that could be a "name": the name of the registrar itself, and the name of any associated contact. Am I correct that the search is confined to the registrar name? Or are we supposed to look through to the contact names, and pass back any registrar with a matching contact? Thanks. Brian
- [weirds] RDAP registrar entities Brian Mountford
- Re: [weirds] RDAP registrar entities Andy Newton
- Re: [weirds] RDAP registrar entities Brian Mountford
- Re: [weirds] RDAP registrar entities Brian Mountford
- Re: [weirds] RDAP registrar entities Andrew Newton
- Re: [weirds] RDAP registrar entities Andrew Newton