Re: [weirds] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt

Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net> Tue, 01 May 2012 18:11 UTC

Return-Path: <aservin@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E97421E8088 for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 May 2012 11:11:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, HOST_EQ_DIALUP=0.862, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JuN26tsFaWWn for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 May 2012 11:11:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:4000::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D8721F899F for <weirds@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 May 2012 11:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (r186-48-223-201.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy [186.48.223.201]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id A68CE308436; Tue, 1 May 2012 15:11:00 -0300 (UYT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_128FEF93-37F0-4D3D-9479-FFEBF3BC17E9"
From: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F0D5F6DB6@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 15:10:48 -0300
Message-Id: <EC3C5A07-13B2-431F-BC33-3E040269980B@lacnic.net>
References: <20120501024631.97808.qmail@joyce.lan> <6DAAECD8-30D3-4195-BE44-C95D0EE3ECE3@icann.org> <0145b859-fce2-488d-a9a9-b629525e2b6b@email.android.com> <25F98C9D-3F87-49C8-86F7-3E3797779F14@lacnic.net> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F0D5F6DB6@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: aservin@lacnic.net
Cc: "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [weirds] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 18:11:07 -0000

	This seems that is because access restrictions, which I think it could be done with several methods: IP address, certificates, API keys, etc.

	Anyhow, if you are going to authenticate by IP address you are going to see the source address of the connection, not the IP address of the query. Isn't it?

Regards,
as


On 1 May 2012, at 13:49, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:

> Ø  Where is that info in the current whois and more important, why?
>  
> One example: Verisign currently supports whois host lookup by IP address for .com and .net. I don’t know why that capability was added originally, but I believe it’s been there for as long as com/net whois service has been available.
>  
> Scott
>  
> From: weirds-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:weirds-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Arturo Servin
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 11:21 AM
> To: Patrick Vande Walle
> Cc: John Levine; weirds@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [weirds] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt
>  
>  
>           Agree with Patrick.
>  
>           I do not really see the relevance to include that field. 
>  
>           And as Andy mentioned in another e-mail, where is that info in the current whois and more important, why?