Re: [weirds] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt

Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net> Tue, 01 May 2012 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <aservin@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6FB21E80F4 for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 May 2012 08:24:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, HOST_EQ_DIALUP=0.862, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hGTANKp4WHBo for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 May 2012 08:24:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:4000::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D8221E80D9 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 May 2012 08:24:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (r186-48-223-201.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy [186.48.223.201]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E08308427; Tue, 1 May 2012 12:24:47 -0300 (UYT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <7A3EC36C-31DB-47F9-8BEB-DA8D655C5FCE@hxr.us>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 12:24:36 -0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DE4B6FDC-FCF0-49DC-987A-95622E9AC209@lacnic.net>
References: <20120501024631.97808.qmail@joyce.lan> <6DAAECD8-30D3-4195-BE44-C95D0EE3ECE3@icann.org> <AC14FC70-A653-4204-9A78-E40AB68B3228@hxr.us> <B1466110-5ED2-49E9-90A3-7041D4AB3405@icann.org> <7A3EC36C-31DB-47F9-8BEB-DA8D655C5FCE@hxr.us>
To: Andy Newton <andy@hxr.us>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: aservin@lacnic.net
Cc: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>, "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [weirds] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 15:24:43 -0000

	+1

	We can enhance the protocol in round two. 

/as


On 1 May 2012, at 12:01, Andy Newton wrote:

> 
> On May 1, 2012, at 10:49 AM, Dave Piscitello wrote:
> 
>>> And does this feature already exist in many registry Whois servers?
>> 
>> Few I imagine. I know of some research and private applications where this feature is either present or would be attractive. 
>> 
>> Are we only interested in replicating what exists today?
> 
> Given the scope creep seen in this thread (not picking on this particular function), I think it would be wise to do that. There's nothing stopping us from coming back around and adding things later.
> 
> -andy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> weirds mailing list
> weirds@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds