Re: [weirds] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Tue, 01 May 2012 16:57 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D68C21E801B for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 May 2012 09:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.557
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.557 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.042, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yZ1dXXQVu6v3 for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 May 2012 09:57:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cloudmark.com (cmgw1.cloudmark.com [208.83.136.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A538621E8012 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 May 2012 09:57:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com ([72.5.239.25]) by mail.cloudmark.com with bizsmtp id 4gwj1j0010ZaKgw01gwjGr; Tue, 01 May 2012 09:56:43 -0700
X-CMAE-Match: 0
X-CMAE-Score: 0.00
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=RM8x7ve+ c=1 sm=1 a=LdFkGDrDWH2mcjCZERnC4w==:17 a=LvckAehuu68A:10 a=Z73QZrJw8dEA:10 a=zutiEJmiVI4A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=Hh1a8ap2ajn3iSlfUeEA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=LdFkGDrDWH2mcjCZERnC4w==:117
Received: from EXCH-MBX901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::addf:849a:f71c:4a82]) by exch-htcas901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::2524:76b6:a865:539c%10]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Tue, 1 May 2012 09:56:43 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [weirds] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHNJti1X6PeA+oH50GMkDXgVQjCepazZDKQgACJ2QCAAI1uAIAANWiAgACbs4CAAAykAIAAIZgAgAADTYCAAAaSAIAAEDuA//+UBNA=
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 16:56:43 +0000
Message-ID: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E003928108588@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <20120501024631.97808.qmail@joyce.lan> <6DAAECD8-30D3-4195-BE44-C95D0EE3ECE3@icann.org> <AC14FC70-A653-4204-9A78-E40AB68B3228@hxr.us> <B1466110-5ED2-49E9-90A3-7041D4AB3405@icann.org> <7A3EC36C-31DB-47F9-8BEB-DA8D655C5FCE@hxr.us> <DE4B6FDC-FCF0-49DC-987A-95622E9AC209@lacnic.net> <2E0495B1-34E1-47F4-BF04-49FCAE33F15A@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <2E0495B1-34E1-47F4-BF04-49FCAE33F15A@icann.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.20.2.121]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudmark.com; s=default; t=1335891403; bh=OgRVVE73Z3z9KoDPFjEIMv4/fGTQc4GxusG8afTeLus=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=DTvLbzFRh6ubYJ+it6sNemfr3Yg0Sqf1jOWcTk37ujfqwk3ZKFEAKpkr214f5ufyG qqyER9wrxwakpBJOyvR561iOgLaLZx9Ea8t+dA4TEsVuwTDS3ARaLQgWnScqPAfb85 z4bff80mbKFgFlDZ0hHEOUEsu42g4A1ogKe/i2gg=
Subject: Re: [weirds] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 16:57:06 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: weirds-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:weirds-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dave Piscitello
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 9:23 AM
> To: Arturo Servin
> Cc: weirds@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [weirds] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt
> 
> So we're clear, this increases the likelihood that other
> implementations than registry/registrar might extend the protocol in
> non-uniform manners. Would be nice to avoid but I'm not going to fall
> on my sword on this issue in this working group.

Such could be developed as individual submissions until this group finishes its first set of deliverables, and then we could re-charter to take on the extensions.

Just one possible path forward.

-MSK