IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [weirds] feedback on draft-designteam-weirds-using-http

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Thu, 17 May 2012 19:23 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7E721F86EA for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:23:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.564
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.564 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.035, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F90U1xYutGef for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:23:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cloudmark.com (cmgw1.cloudmark.com [208.83.136.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2A221F86CE for <weirds@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:23:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com ([72.5.239.25]) by mail.cloudmark.com with bizsmtp id B7Pb1j0030ZaKgw017PcGA; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:23:36 -0700
X-CMAE-Match: 0
X-CMAE-Score: 0.00
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=eMmRfQV1 c=1 sm=1 a=LdFkGDrDWH2mcjCZERnC4w==:17 a=LvckAehuu68A:10 a=1L7oTAkmhP8A:10 a=zutiEJmiVI4A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=b6nfwRhkAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=tDDaspz6yCORLih6ML8A:9 a=BB7VPUwor3-5h54t1d8A:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=LdFkGDrDWH2mcjCZERnC4w==:117
Received: from EXCH-MBX901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::addf:849a:f71c:4a82]) by exch-htcas901.corp.cloudmark.com ([fe80::2524:76b6:a865:539c%10]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:19:35 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [weirds] feedback on draft-designteam-weirds-using-http
Thread-Index: AQHNMqKN91lSNuvWGku8vXNWvmXLmZbOiPUAgAATlgCAADB9gP//kW3g
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 19:19:35 +0000
Message-ID: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E003928125977@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <4FB26082.3070800@gmx.de> <9B94D739-E037-4539-82E8-0E79BBFEC543@hxr.us> <4FB520B4.1070803@gmx.de> <A58EF70A-BBAA-4DA5-A951-C1F16356F741@hxr.us>
In-Reply-To: <A58EF70A-BBAA-4DA5-A951-C1F16356F741@hxr.us>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.20.2.121]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudmark.com; s=default; t=1337282616; bh=q5ja/xLJYV+eUNgRM8jAXBjHfY0MkcSqEbq3fHnQi2Q=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=miJgryJ6ONVEAOfYG92RJ+2EqTiIEPWsQteXDrnVu9WKDAOkZbrs12P3GhYq9o9hq aPtV7hISHDqdqhx4tphGOdM+k5F+nNPnKTcepW0FhKHCRvZsMLrnoYY0cV8Dl5jmp2 73fuAc/8WObkGpEyTZqi4erWarPd3oI0WQLT3K5c=
Subject: Re: [weirds] feedback on draft-designteam-weirds-using-http
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 19:23:48 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: weirds-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:weirds-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andy Newton
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2012 11:54 AM
> To: Julian Reschke
> Cc: weirds@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [weirds] feedback on draft-designteam-weirds-using-http
> 
> On May 17, 2012, at 12:00 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> > Using URI templates sound promising.
> 
> This keeps coming up, but so far nobody has shown why it is useful. I
> think what we want out of URI templating is to be shown what utility it
> adds before placing it in the specifications.

Mark Nottingham made a good verbal argument for this in Paris, none of which I remember.  I've asked him to send me a summary of his points.  I'll forward it here when I get it.

This is important for what's going on in REPUTE as well, for the same reasons.

-MSK

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status