Re: [weirds] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt

"John Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Tue, 01 May 2012 02:46 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8697521E80BA for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.605
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.605 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.594, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Z7kSub8Z5vh for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B53A21E8144 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 71284 invoked from network); 1 May 2012 02:46:54 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 1 May 2012 02:46:54 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=4f9f4e9d.xn--yuvv84g.k1204; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=tBxfZN9NXuoOUbzei8P4CpCVhzqvBfUUQp8dIPdjgG0=; b=STgZTZKgFPDR8ANpJzQn9SN2U/r4vretGIZm4jxelu+ybPf5X4pXdKMCF0i7qBDzH7cLRe+YHTjzm/j2Ulc8rFFCFg5UZ8fjAIfbp1V4wGGDlCfbd/QIzXoMQ/OINApKBjcKmOYVsezuleWfcR7TiscWEimInVRKwAsXmz2ZjZk=
VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 02:46:31 -0000
Message-ID: <20120501024631.97808.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
To: weirds@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <3BF23CEE-7493-49CF-84FB-01167813F267@apnic.net>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [weirds] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 02:46:55 -0000

>I find the notion of asking a domain registrar for information about an
>IP address to be confusing.  Is the user expecting to know who they
>should contact about that IP address, are they expecting to find all the
>possible mappings of labels to that IP address , or are they expecting
>to have the domain query service perform a reverse lookup for them? 

For a name registry or registrar, I'd be thrilled to get a list of
name servers they know about that resolve to that IP.  A common bad
guy trick is to register a bunch of names, stick them all on the same
servers, but use a different subdomain name for each one, e.g. foo.biz
has name server ns1.foo.biz and bar.biz has ns1.bar.biz , but they're
really the same IP.

R's,
John