Re: [weirds] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt

Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net> Tue, 01 May 2012 19:28 UTC

Return-Path: <aservin@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0DE21E8084 for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 May 2012 12:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, HOST_EQ_DIALUP=0.862, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=0.877, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cZOyJdjRu5Ob for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 May 2012 12:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:4000::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E53521E8053 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 May 2012 12:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (r186-48-223-201.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy [186.48.223.201]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1707308427; Tue, 1 May 2012 16:28:35 -0300 (UYT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4595C348-3615-4897-B88E-0878752C25E8"
From: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F0D5F7018@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 16:28:23 -0300
Message-Id: <E8B46B21-ADA1-4B45-87FE-56CE51D054F1@lacnic.net>
References: <20120501024631.97808.qmail@joyce.lan> <6DAAECD8-30D3-4195-BE44-C95D0EE3ECE3@icann.org> <0145b859-fce2-488d-a9a9-b629525e2b6b@email.android.com> <25F98C9D-3F87-49C8-86F7-3E3797779F14@lacnic.net> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F0D5F6DB6@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <EC3C5A07-13B2-431F-BC33-3E040269980B@lacnic.net> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F0D5F7018@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
To: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: aservin@lacnic.net
Cc: "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [weirds] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 19:28:32 -0000

	Probably not.

	Now, after clearing the confusion, the reply of this query looks like an RIR reply and I still not see why we would want it in the name world.

Regards,
.as

On 1 May 2012, at 15:44, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:

> I’m talking about a query like this, not authentication by IP address:
>  
> whois –h whois.verisign-grs.com 198.41.1.1
>  
> Are we talking about the same thing?
>  
> Scott
>  
> From: Arturo Servin [mailto:aservin@lacnic.net] 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 2:11 PM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
> Cc: weirds@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [weirds] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt
>  
>  
>           This seems that is because access restrictions, which I think it could be done with several methods: IP address, certificates, API keys, etc.
>  
>           Anyhow, if you are going to authenticate by IP address you are going to see the source address of the connection, not the IP address of the query. Isn't it?
>  
> Regards,
> as
>  
>  
> On 1 May 2012, at 13:49, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> 
> 
> Ø  Where is that info in the current whois and more important, why?
>  
> One example: Verisign currently supports whois host lookup by IP address for .com and .net. I don’t know why that capability was added originally, but I believe it’s been there for as long as com/net whois service has been available.
>  
> Scott
>  
> From: weirds-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:weirds-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Arturo Servin
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 11:21 AM
> To: Patrick Vande Walle
> Cc: John Levine; weirds@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [weirds] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt
>  
>  
>           Agree with Patrick.
>  
>           I do not really see the relevance to include that field. 
>  
>           And as Andy mentioned in another e-mail, where is that info in the current whois and more important, why?
>