IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [weirds] Query Parameters

"Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com> Fri, 04 May 2012 16:26 UTC

Return-Path: <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24EF121F85DB for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2012 09:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OZnM3YX6QjAk for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2012 09:26:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod6og103.obsmtp.com (exprod6og103.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.185]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BFB021F85A8 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 May 2012 09:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from peregrine.verisign.com ([216.168.239.74]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob103.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT6QDMn3zP0+GtOCsjLiLx7UtQ2nGwBEl@postini.com; Fri, 04 May 2012 09:26:28 PDT
Received: from brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.205]) by peregrine.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id q44GQMgL015504 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 4 May 2012 12:26:22 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Fri, 4 May 2012 12:26:22 -0400
From: "Hollenbeck, Scott" <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
To: Andy Newton <andy@arin.net>
Thread-Topic: [weirds] Query Parameters
Thread-Index: AQHNKgGSpYXNrU2Cw0OxCUJHOuJc4Ja5/C0AgAAEH4CAAAsqAP//xWlQ
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 16:26:20 +0000
Message-ID: <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F0D5F8BB0@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
References: <4FA1610E.3050706@abenaki.wabanaki.net> <CBC86177.2C58A%francisco.arias@icann.org> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F0D5F89E6@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <3CA89753-5151-46B2-A0C7-2E84C7283265@arin.net> <831693C2CDA2E849A7D7A712B24E257F0D5F8B1F@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <2AFB1EFC-428B-4567-9A60-1E7D8CF9FDAB@arin.net>
In-Reply-To: <2AFB1EFC-428B-4567-9A60-1E7D8CF9FDAB@arin.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [weirds] Query Parameters
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 16:26:29 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Newton [mailto:andy@arin.net]
> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 11:55 AM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
> Cc: weirds@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [weirds] Query Parameters
> 
> 
> On May 4, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> 
> > Maybe, I'm not sure. If I'm writing client code I would probably want
> to support as many query parameters as possible to work with as many
> servers as possible, and having all client query parameters specified
> in one document would probably be easier than having to worry about
> multiple documents. A server operator that doesn't support a particular
> type of query can just return an appropriate HTTP response.
> >
> > I guess I'm saying that I don't think we should be writing clients on
> a per-registry basis.
> 
> Good point. I still agree with Francisco's idea of separating search
> drafts out.

I do, too.

> Perhaps we should think about an Informational that describes
> everything and references all the drafts. I think the original URN
> working group did this.

That sounds like a good idea.

Scott

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status