Re: [weirds] fyi: WHOIS Policy Review Team Final Report

SM <sm@resistor.net> Thu, 17 May 2012 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07CC421F86C6 for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.485
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.485 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.114, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gwCWqFep8-6K for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:12:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B0E021F86BB for <weirds@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:12:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4HHC6j1025757; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:12:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1337274733; i=@resistor.net; bh=7MVYLPNl/c9osI8iez73OKFkgfQCVPZOrPjrR94mMOk=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=PrcHeXN0U9Bcw61vnz1poiGHHW4NmLob6ZgaOg/cwB7XnjyIV9Sh2sQYdQqtsdpmV BrxrkXe513u99tLj6kDm6SaaOCXSf+jEQ+oqXewouXkKtZKq9cg29sCe3LwuGC388Z y5tm1M2L38OQ5jbCX1R03xY9Ng6qQ9Mbga/txTfo=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1337274733; i=@resistor.net; bh=7MVYLPNl/c9osI8iez73OKFkgfQCVPZOrPjrR94mMOk=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=Iwf7xL6fMH+rZEZPo02Di3EOq35mFbMfkYoGCtDUz8U7CuJ4GVsdhrY987Lccfplk VovSNVS4PaKA3X+rIeA82Skwhjhl8mDGBhkf6wylmUMgpbV2y1nJuu7FSrT2+WQysh tKNtAJkPfNjIczcKzqLy97fwO+VIu9ZoSoI8Qi30=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20120517095938.0a91fb10@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 10:05:55 -0700
To: Wendy Seltzer <wendy@seltzer.org>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <4FB4B578.1070903@seltzer.org>
References: <20120517013357.74850.qmail@joyce.lan> <4FB4B578.1070903@seltzer.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: weirds@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [weirds] fyi: WHOIS Policy Review Team Final Report
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 17:12:15 -0000

Hi Wendy,
At 01:23 17-05-2012, Wendy Seltzer wrote:
>And I think it's an absurd report, with disproportionate emphasis on
>WHOIS accuracy and proposed mandates, and insufficient attention to
>privacy concerns.  Good thing we're not ICANN.

There was a presentation about privacy in SAAG.  Privacy tends to be 
a complex to resolve from a technical perspective due to lack of 
input about that aspect during the design of a protocol.

Regards,
-sm