Re: [weirds] Domain Reputation in RDAP

Dave Piscitello <dave.piscitello@icann.org> Tue, 08 December 2015 16:21 UTC

Return-Path: <dave.piscitello@icann.org>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE251B2FAF for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 08:21:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.431
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.431 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VG9EyZN9o_5n for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 08:21:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-2.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36F1D1B2FB0 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 08:21:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-2.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.25; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 08:21:27 -0800
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1044.021; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 08:21:27 -0800
From: Dave Piscitello <dave.piscitello@icann.org>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Thread-Topic: [weirds] Domain Reputation in RDAP
Thread-Index: AdEtG45Y/Eguxg6XRvqNNe39ahP/CwASI9uAAADDgYABG8uoAP//6OIsgACWf4D//3zj4A==
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 16:21:26 +0000
Message-ID: <CB2E3EA8-162E-40A7-A268-26C1236BFE36@icann.org>
References: <CAAQiQRdMCUn1UNeNhB3XukBpnNMiCWLdyijgtytp91WsNEx07w@mail.gmail.com> <20151202170851.23051.qmail@ary.lan>, <CAL0qLwaCJs4jprZiUabYNkLByCmjd4EuH9nLbsHSPXD+T5GKSw@mail.gmail.com> <CDE51C6D-A1DF-4758-A6C6-FAF142BF97C6@icann.org>, <alpine.OSX.2.11.1512081108470.32877@ary.lan>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1512081108470.32877@ary.lan>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/weirds/s6zATHOUTh_YsJKTkq1MM70EXK4>
Cc: "weirds@ietf.org" <weirds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [weirds] Domain Reputation in RDAP
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/weirds/>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 16:21:31 -0000

Policy activity exists to look at how registries will monitor or report abuse so this might be an opportune time to include RDAP considerations.  

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 8, 2015, at 11:11, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

>> Could this also be some 'car fax' indicator that discloses whether a domain has been block listed, when, by whom, for reason? While some ICANN heads might explode others might be curious to understand what framework or policy obligation this would imply.
> 
> That'd be OK with me but merely deciding which domain blocklists to look at is highly political.  Also, I wouldn't assume that the BLs would be willing to provide a suitable feed to all the registries.  Some registries like .org have a good reputation while some like .xyz do not.
> 
> Regards,
> John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
> Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.