Re: [weirds] feedback on draft-designteam-weirds-using-http

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 17 May 2012 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E1721F865B for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:40:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.566
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kOPFQKXldu85 for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:40:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5092721F8659 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:40:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 May 2012 17:40:26 -0000
Received: from p54BB26EE.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [84.187.38.238] by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 17 May 2012 19:40:26 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18u6IwP8R4udKB2+L7rgvtTf6STv/V4rvgwrj4YPe iM+Qv4C0FgB7+z
Message-ID: <4FB537EB.7010908@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 19:39:55 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
References: <20120517173250.5000.qmail@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20120517173250.5000.qmail@joyce.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: weirds@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [weirds] feedback on draft-designteam-weirds-using-http
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 17:40:28 -0000

On 2012-05-17 19:32, John Levine wrote:
>> Using URI templates sound promising.
>
> I sure hope not.  URI templates are a reasonable way to try to put a
> consistent layer on top of a bunch of existing inconsistent http
> services.  But in this situation, where we're able to spec the URIs
> from scratch, they're just an extra level of unneeded complexity and
> cruft.
>
> R's,
> John

I have no problem with the protocol hardwiring things into URIs, if that 
can be done. But please stay away from the term "restful" then.

Best regards, Julian