Re: [weirds] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt

Antoin Verschuren <antoin.verschuren@sidn.nl> Tue, 01 May 2012 08:18 UTC

Return-Path: <Antoin.Verschuren@sidn.nl>
X-Original-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: weirds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B054521F869C for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 May 2012 01:18:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.504
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Me4SwojnySHl for <weirds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 May 2012 01:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ede1-kamx.sidn.nl (kamx.sidn.nl [94.198.152.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1D821F8697 for <weirds@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 May 2012 01:18:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kahubcas1.SIDN.local ([192.168.2.41]) by ede1-kamx.sidn.nl with ESMTP id q418I4G3028542 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=CAFAIL) for <weirds@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 May 2012 10:18:04 +0200
Received: from [192.168.129.215] (192.168.129.215) by KAHUBCAS1.SIDN.local (192.168.2.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.247.3; Tue, 1 May 2012 10:18:05 +0200
Message-ID: <4F9F9C92.1080002@sidn.nl>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 10:19:30 +0200
From: Antoin Verschuren <antoin.verschuren@sidn.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120412 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: weirds@ietf.org
References: <20120501024631.97808.qmail@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20120501024631.97808.qmail@joyce.lan>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.129.215]
Subject: Re: [weirds] I-D Action: draft-hollenbeck-dnrd-ap-query-00.txt
X-BeenThere: weirds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "WHOIS-based Extensible Internet Registration Data Service \(WEIRDS\)" <weirds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/weirds>
List-Post: <mailto:weirds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/weirds>, <mailto:weirds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 08:18:08 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01-05-12 04:46, John Levine wrote:
> 
> For a name registry or registrar, I'd be thrilled to get a list of 
> name servers they know about that resolve to that IP.  A common
> bad guy trick is to register a bunch of names, stick them all on
> the same servers, but use a different subdomain name for each one,
> e.g. foo.biz has name server ns1.foo.biz and bar.biz has
> ns1.bar.biz , but they're really the same IP.

Before people are getting too wet erotic area's, I think the request
is not about names.
For a names registry, only forward lookups are permitted, so query a
name, and get back IPs'. Querying for an IP and getting back names
from a names registry is, although perhaps technically viable, not
permitted by at least European database law.
I can imagine that it's cool info though, I would certainly like a
query for a postal code and get a list of all Internet resources
listed at that physical address. Great marketing info, but not the
info a registry is supposed to deliver.

The IP query is for RIR's I suppose. They deliver IP blocks, so
querying for an IP there will give you their registration data for
that block. No reverse search.

The ID search is something registrars indeed sometimes use to see if
the object that exists in their internal DB still exist in the
registries DB so they link the correct objects. But also here, it's
only a forward object search, no information on what other objects are
linked to it in the registry DB.
Or to give an example: I want to know when registering a new object if
my role-object in the registry DB is still correct, so I query for it
by object-ID, that I know by heart or is in my own administration. I
then only get back that object, and not all the resources that it is
used in.


- -- 
Antoin Verschuren

Technical Policy Advisor SIDN
Meander 501, PO Box 5022, 6802 EA Arnhem, The Netherlands

P: +31 26 3525500  F: +31 26 3525505  M: +31 6 23368970
mailto:antoin.verschuren@sidn.nl  xmpp:antoin@jabber.sidn.nl
http://www.sidn.nl/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPn5ySAAoJEDqHrM883AgnkosIAM1JQE8FE4QSLPy0/hZOiC13
pLYr62vN6FZ4KINLHHqrwkvGO97exen8EV/1wG3f8bPNkbZE1104pWJVqh//YSFq
7lH7aCPhi6aZH0hbtNe0HPO8/FLDEfucElqsevsRR/NdarqQ2Ahd+7ul4pCUB3zY
R8x4/9MjGaUqpcOx3tglXFqb3sU/W0oFUrIfMwXklI0B7GpcbEvOj3ul1yqYSRmi
H0X6vskeo+LmuYXgjWg98JRhdx/Z/s2/WA8A7g0zw8MV3yvQMs1gbrRFu/gZ/KIi
GaAU5iTkTool9bggA1vPWWgIxEbkzjt69YSNeAiajW1iKa/tjOeJw2HAmBiTHiA=
=TQ+5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----