Re: Request for well-known URI: pcarrier/connstats
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Sun, 31 January 2016 02:14 UTC
Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BBE91B3E10 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 18:14:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.703
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.703 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QAc9DjG8ilwa for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 18:14:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6E141B3E0F for <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 18:14:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (unknown [120.149.194.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 275BA22E1F4; Sat, 30 Jan 2016 21:14:31 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
Subject: Re: Request for well-known URI: pcarrier/connstats
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAOkgWeUiZgOpcMf8Sa6e=JJhydDxRFQ3QF-s6q1+JjJFnv0q6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 13:14:29 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6971D267-256B-491F-8F41-1D476EF75234@mnot.net>
References: <CAOkgWeVPU4yuHH-Oj-_kGmjALJhHGO6aJ8pMghMsw8S3awww3A@mail.gmail.com> <CAOkgWeUiZgOpcMf8Sa6e=JJhydDxRFQ3QF-s6q1+JjJFnv0q6A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pierre Carrier <pierre@gcarrier.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wellknown-uri-review/-VJqxqyP4Z0vP3j19cAH4F4fXyM>
Cc: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Well-Known URI review list <wellknown-uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wellknown-uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 02:14:35 -0000
Hi Pierre, You can't include a "/" in a registry entry, but you do effectively control the space "under" a registered name, so you could just register "pcarrier" and then use "pcarrier/connstats". Having said that -- I don't know if it's a great idea to have folks registering their usernames here (for a few different reasons). Would you consider using something like "meteor-connstats"? Cheers, > On 26 Jan 2016, at 5:56 pm, Pierre Carrier <pierre@gcarrier.fr> wrote: > > URI suffix: "pcarrier/connstats" > > Change controller: Pierre Carrier <pierre@gcarrier.fr> > > Specification document(s): https://pcarrier.github.io/meteor-connstats > > _______________________________________________ > wellknown-uri-review mailing list > wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
- Request for well-known URI: pcarrier/connstats Pierre Carrier
- Re: Request for well-known URI: pcarrier/connstats Pierre Carrier
- Re: Request for well-known URI: pcarrier/connstats Mark Nottingham