Re: Request for review

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 05 August 2021 00:14 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5EE3A0A69 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 17:14:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=g/0gER10; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=NKAnMC+X
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TPVwamQvPNSb for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 17:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBE243A0A64 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 17:14:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30715C015B; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 20:14:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 04 Aug 2021 20:14:16 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm3; bh=m xDEBZ10OikcnHejoKRRBI5Iuv7EVEj6yBjxGLV4xW0=; b=g/0gER10M+MzqVl8y 17dbwTp8FnrtCabxNMaON3HppzugBxHBPcpweko+WHpzLnBNCJOHW7rNnVNJEjCW 8vp3IAsM62UcLeFQOlQ3tB9b2LMI5LZECcXzTmABhX6UuZsl7pgdvCqOUlocgrmw fomWnqA1F16/d7uKeof8xsv4r5dKYg5cRwXy73zGkGBZ0B9CCFlQBnyCdgCsPSI/ LFotjc35+X8nv+SX2R/hEdaFD0L/Aro9TzUyd7gkX2eJ/6z0Pd8d1xWP2tRNsD9z egSd5MUQ0py7dCZMItBwKp7B/pQyRcXZma1/bTTq2X3fqh+zNal9QwyNvPJv+Hq0 vJAkA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=mxDEBZ10OikcnHejoKRRBI5Iuv7EVEj6yBjxGLV4x W0=; b=NKAnMC+Xj6ITdeoFIiT/hwYVnIpqPfjQ+if4hCavAzce7sbxoWYtIQuwS n/jlGj02Qd/BIuLIIvmh6bwlnt5UaEDAD+1Kz6pBGzlSnBpIdWUiJ4QL6qqKunWw kguYHnRK5/007ktAcJUp2VujDhsaFgVUlGbReR9F81qnh3DD4/J0CLcdq2gWhjPF ANS/yauUaLhNVuNVUQv2bRrRNt0yrzzFAQ1k7THI2GvIBQd4JyT8sMobJ1eH95n0 3hS3JQbH6bGDg1IKsnzGJFHSl79izxgXBcLJdoTwTX1th/Ki2vH4A9I6lnq2DF4t 9SsxHYPX0B1YSyJeKs7et4NYsZ3mQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Vi0LYT56BBnLDTdLQhlsjhyIuGWj2gruYYwAtm3IUN8X3yLhvX3ElQ> <xme:Vi0LYY7c2WkuRE6d52oLfH93wG9HciJL6IGjTE2d8AjJuWXMhEzJ6qVOnXaBCkimt PbRsgnBdj60OB8SWQ>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:Vi0LYafUMjzU7pnvYXE7M8ompjePxgJGxMHkFHdsV5VxXz_X0C__LtFXk8bK_DxPfNJZgUsm1Zw8-VTd40LPolCbylAqUOIDR3ocCRi9OR6UjNzZXfxs1yNZ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrieekgddvlecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtdejnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrkhcu pfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepudegveeigfehffeghfeghfffudegfeeuudeghedtgfetleefgfffuddtffejteef necuffhomhgrihhnpehrfhgtqdgvughithhorhdrohhrghdpihgvthhfrdhorhhgpdhmnh hothdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhr ohhmpehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Vi0LYUIBim0Dsjj2HYzkf2cy1m7uBE9qgD9tBQ1dogwc-1dXkatLwA> <xmx:Vi0LYXKZ_0GHevGRmdwjXOdj0b7mWp2PxQMiJNHIt-nxD8BKeLyzCw> <xmx:Vi0LYdxdr4-aT1sXtyYqntPpX6GcQ6Rg_x76jVPy1EDzdDdFhibL-Q> <xmx:WC0LYf_qnLKUaq5KAUqEUJ7k4e-QFFjL1YBeyDDW13avrZl66ShrUw>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 4 Aug 2021 20:14:12 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
Subject: Re: Request for review
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <8fd93bbe-011e-6324-5a9d-3de40b1904fc@uniovi.es>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 10:14:10 +1000
Cc: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org, Rafa Marin-Lopez <rafa@um.es>, Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com>, Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E467B972-8165-4538-AF8D-D6FE3DF6CABA@mnot.net>
References: <267a860e-d5c8-66ac-f1b3-e29d7ca11de5@uniovi.es> <7673C783-3010-40D9-8D17-6DB7DE8E5BD2@mnot.net> <8fd93bbe-011e-6324-5a9d-3de40b1904fc@uniovi.es>
To: Dan Garcia Carrillo <garciadan@uniovi.es>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wellknown-uri-review/-frYSor_IH4sT80ESMjYH7rSGHU>
X-BeenThere: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Well-Known URI review list <wellknown-uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wellknown-uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 00:14:23 -0000

Great. If you'd like an early registration, please see:
  https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7120.html#section-3

Cheers,


> On 4 Aug 2021, at 8:13 pm, Dan Garcia Carrillo <garciadan@uniovi.es> wrote:
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> 'coap-eap' is acceptable to us, yes.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Dan.
> 
> El 8/4/2021 a las 2:51 AM, Mark Nottingham escribió:
>> Hi Dan,
>> 
>> Since this mechanism appears to be COAP-specific, would 'coap-eap' be workable?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> 
>>> On 3 Aug 2021, at 9:45 pm, Dan Garcia Carrillo <garciadan@uniovi.es> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear wellknown-uri experts,
>>> 
>>> I'd like to request a review of registration request for the URI .well-known/eap, which after the last IETF meeting of the ACE working group seems to be the best fit for the work found in  -- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap
>>> 
>>> Summary: CoAP-EAP defines an EAP lower layer for CoAP, as a CoAP service. This entails communication between to CoAP endpoints to perform an EAP exchange to authenticate both CoAP endpoints so the newcommer can join the security domain and do so securely.
>>> 
>>> Thank you for your consideration.
>>> Best Regards,
>>> 
>>> Dan.
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> wellknown-uri-review mailing list
>>> wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review
>> --
>> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/