Re: Request for well-known URI: est

[SM <[e-mail]>]

Hi Sean,
At 19:50 16-08-2013, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>The IANA Considerations section of the EST spec says:
>
>    IANA is to update the well-known URI registry with the following
>    filled-in template from [RFC5785].
>
>       URI suffix: est
>
>       Change controller: IETF
>
>That doesn't cover what it needs to cover, i.e., the kind of information
>mentioned in RFC 5785:
>
>    Typically, a registration will reference a specification that defines
>    the format and associated media type to be obtained by dereferencing
>    the well-known URI.
>
>    It MAY also contain additional information, such as the syntax of
>    additional path components, query strings and/or fragment identifiers
>    to be appended to the well-known URI, or protocol-specific details
>    (e.g., HTTP [RFC2616] method handling).
>
>None of that "additional information" is in the registration request, so
>it's not clear to me that IANA will have the information it needs to
>properly process this registration.

IANA, in its review of the draft, mentioned that it needs the 
following information:

   URI suffix: est
   Change controller: IETF
   Reference: [ RFC-to-be ]
   Related Information:
   Date Registered: [ TBD-at-registration ]
   Date Modified:

Could you please suggest to the authors of draft-ietf-pkix-est to add:

   Reference: [this document]

to the request for the well-known URI in Section 6?

Regards,
-sm