Re: Request for well-known URI: associations.json
Patrick Stahlberg <pstahlb@google.com> Thu, 04 June 2015 04:12 UTC
Return-Path: <pstahlb@google.com>
X-Original-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471D81B3435 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 21:12:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SsOKkLZqtSAo for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 21:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x230.google.com (mail-qk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 913661B3433 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 21:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qkhq76 with SMTP id q76so17903138qkh.2 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 21:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=q5PS7VHT9V24rm8wnBMUULvhJub2+ioXlSwPksH9Xc8=; b=UTPPBmde4GE2iT9I/uvus7aK7/jjLFVMsTxCLxiGSsJS3DeZpi6Wje9gW6J421KYeG Ibgydqir9Mf2WcUJZBUmz5oiKZv4poDnfvnGZ8DwoaZVaOGxwnzUQQlr7+/MHpieu3Ti lQlcfA0hcTQJaW+uS7gZVmx3RvgOSAQemt9p1Q1ycAVv2P4KhO90xdi+RjsB88GdgHn6 dFaqlm4EKW6+6nfrqTXLg7C3rf6tR+BD4qUIlRoI3TS8qhGkCzGQvXsccIfYspHBO+N2 uEt0grMwoD5SufCteOQT3vMlCIFN3iydl9l0pJYOXmegMaTpbYmwXchZ4YcisTMqFPk2 Zoig==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=q5PS7VHT9V24rm8wnBMUULvhJub2+ioXlSwPksH9Xc8=; b=SH6CoF09t53MIza5v/8oMC96xeVr++LijzWLelSJ+5wx8Q2eO6wKVJ7uS5SPT91vrA HAinYcEcKyMoIyzTEYziMNWr7zwPfSB4r1/sXeUVjwEX5W8Ogsm8qDOib1pKC7N6ChVx 9xrL8AEFKeyh532wj0hsA5xNF0iR2Ox73w+OyyEZEJWbLrv/VycXcN+0swS3lp5LR6ES tY0C/NIU03U7dm/uHXpJT1q07wzxg8XD/K0pNxp+Y3bgBZ2Bdu2FSfbzHrrxSfPJKiU6 4YG+RcZONCHzPII5Vx0/rn3fP56VotFS/mASCoTt7E7qq+hZoDFGln/zqMKpBzyuhkbz wcsA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkFvXizAFAFDoymwXXz2gCEsMvD/dyUlcWOKfc/aV977sbDe0aPxDISeWu1QJpFjVACwrDw
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.98.237 with SMTP id o100mr40181262qge.1.1433391140782; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 21:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.196.73 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Jun 2015 21:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D9267479-D98E-47F9-B69F-D0D10BD85693@mnot.net>
References: <CABP3xjyV80p2Y2rj6JUSKAro1vRziSntUmQPzM06g563h8J4jw@mail.gmail.com> <4820CA4B-C98B-4CC8-BDE5-83A5C7A5CE57@mnot.net> <CABP3xjy5NwgT4TSUs8Pksdp-3jXKyTUaUQyWYHi0M4D4KO_ZxA@mail.gmail.com> <CABP3xjx+UeOL0NdKgzThTTZrKvqTjD3eUrEUhzQJjev0soWjSQ@mail.gmail.com> <AACC2DB3-ED7A-467A-8C41-378A15B8B24B@mnot.net> <CABP3xjwG3QaDwDb_esCjvzV8jjTQNVwDMRno0qGFfibTPV9K2Q@mail.gmail.com> <836AF9CF-6271-4670-B309-9EEBF772AB66@mnot.net> <CABP3xjwv1rAFgtqra40+VpZgeoo923g3iftMZFd7iu6qLjJj5w@mail.gmail.com> <CABP3xjwHy5VPDH6btPTL_0Ptcy+eJ5mH2TVS7oehebopzU24vw@mail.gmail.com> <CABP3xjwphVFR8uRN=gXOPni+Zk4hEy4mz=Ni-Dgsk57f_cimdQ@mail.gmail.com> <D9267479-D98E-47F9-B69F-D0D10BD85693@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 00:12:20 -0400
Message-ID: <CABP3xjyEwS=iXEZrEJjKCjcMELS6nonLU_kETgsEqOKZFtEbTg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Request for well-known URI: associations.json
From: Patrick Stahlberg <pstahlb@google.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113a9322c57a540517a9614f"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wellknown-uri-review/3XxkSWh_X66tDCVo1gAqfPmw9sY>
Cc: Umesh Shankar <ushankar@google.com>, wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Well-Known URI review list <wellknown-uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wellknown-uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 04:12:30 -0000
Thanks, Mark! Yes, we will clean the spec up and host it at a stable URL. We will need a few days to do that, but I will let you know when it's done. -- Patrick On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:51 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > Hi Patrick, > > Sorry for the delay. That sounds fine. > > Can you put the spec at a stable URL? It's fine if it gets updated. > > Thanks, > > > > On 28 May 2015, at 11:29 am, Patrick Stahlberg <pstahlb@google.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi Mark, > > > > friendly ping :) -- how does assetlinks.json sound? > > > > > > -- > > Patrick > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Patrick Stahlberg <pstahlb@google.com> > wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > > > after conferring with the team, we would like to request > "assetlinks.json". Thanks for bearing with us while we make up our minds. > > > > > > -- > > Patrick > > > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Patrick Stahlberg <pstahlb@google.com> > wrote: > > We wanted something short, but we absolutely see your point about it > being generic. asset_statements.json doesn't sound too bad, but it's quite > long and we worry that people will get confused about whether there is a > dash or an underscore in the name. Does "assetlinks.json" or even simply > "assetlinks" sound acceptable to you? > > > > Thanks, > > Patrick > > On May 21, 2015 1:05 AM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > Thanks. > > > > "statements.json" does indeed seem very generic; is there a reason > you're not using something like "asset_statements.json"? > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > On 20 May 2015, at 8:38 pm, Patrick Stahlberg <pstahlb@google.com> > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Mark, > > > > > > apologies -- I had read your earlier email as "you're good to go; just > send us the spec when your product launches". That's entirely my fault. > > > > > > We've prepared a spec and it's attached as a PDF file. It's still in > a somewhat rough shape, but should have all the important pieces. > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Patrick > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> > wrote: > > > Hi Patrick, > > > > > > Again, having the spec is the next necessary step. I can't really > comment on the name until I've seen it — although "statements" is > *extremely* generic. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 15 May 2015, at 1:06 am, Patrick Stahlberg <pstahlb@google.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi again, > > > > > > > > our project has evolved a bit. We would still like to store > information about the relationship between online assets, but the > information is going to be encoded in the form of "statements". Therefore, > we think a more fitting name would now be: > > > > > > > > .well-known/statements.json > > > > > > > > Do we still have your preliminary approval for this new name? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Patrick > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 9:08 PM, Patrick Stahlberg < > pstahlb@google.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Mark, > > > > > > > > Thanks! We will let you know. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Patrick > > > > On Mar 31, 2015 8:52 PM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > > > > Hi Patrick, > > > > > > > > Sure. Best thing to do is to ping this list once your spec becomes > public (even in draft form), and we’ll do the registration. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 1 Apr 2015, at 5:20 am, Patrick Stahlberg <pstahlb@google.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I am writing on behalf of a team at Google working on new ways to > surface associations between web sites and other online "assets". For a > planned launch, we would like to register the well-known URI > "associations.json" as requested in RFC 5785. > > > > > > > > > > We would like to ask web site owners to publish a file at this > location that follows a simple JSON format and that includes information > about other assets that are related to the site on which the > associations.json is published. We plan for the format to be open and > usable by anyone. We would like to publish a full specification of the > format once we have enough confidence internally in its design. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Patrick > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > wellknown-uri-review mailing list > > > > > wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org > > > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <AssetLinksWell-KnownURISpec.pdf>_______________________________________________ > > > wellknown-uri-review mailing list > > > wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review > > > > -- > > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > >
- Request for well-known URI: associations.json Patrick Stahlberg
- Re: Request for well-known URI: associations.json Mark Nottingham
- Re: Request for well-known URI: associations.json Patrick Stahlberg
- Re: Request for well-known URI: associations.json Patrick Stahlberg
- Re: Request for well-known URI: associations.json Mark Nottingham
- Re: Request for well-known URI: associations.json Patrick Stahlberg
- Re: Request for well-known URI: associations.json Mark Nottingham
- Re: Request for well-known URI: associations.json Patrick Stahlberg
- Re: Request for well-known URI: associations.json Patrick Stahlberg
- Re: Request for well-known URI: associations.json Patrick Stahlberg
- Re: Request for well-known URI: associations.json Mark Nottingham
- Re: Request for well-known URI: associations.json Patrick Stahlberg
- Re: Request for well-known URI: associations.json Patrick Stahlberg
- Re: Request for well-known URI: associations.json Mark Nottingham