RE: Review requested for the webfinger well-known URI

Mark,

Sure.  I have to be careful with use of "parameters" as folks get onto me
for using the phrase "query parameter".

How about this:
"The query to the WebFinger resource will include one or more parameters in
the query string.  The representation returned by a WebFinger resource will
be a JSON Resource Descriptor (JRD) as described in Section 4.4 of RFC
XXXX."

Paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Nottingham [mailto:mnot@mnot.net]
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 9:04 AM
> To: Paul E. Jones
> Cc: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org; IANA
> Subject: Re: Review requested for the webfinger well-known URI
> 
> Hi Paul,
> 
> Just a suggestion - it might be worth noting in 'related information'
> that the well-known URI can take a query parameter, with a reference to
> section 4.1.
> 
> Regardless, request approved.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> On 04/03/2013, at 11:29 PM, Paul E. Jones <paulej@packetizer.com> wrote:
> 
> > Experts,
> >
> > Could you please review the WebFinger draft that proposes the
> introduction of a new well-known URI?
> >
> > The text can be found here:
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-webfinger
> >
> > Your comments would be appreciated.
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > wellknown-uri-review mailing list
> > wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
> 
> 