Re: Request for well-known URI: dnt/
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 17 August 2015 05:57 UTC
Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8031B2B6E for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 22:57:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HVbkd_DYL2ZH for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 22:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A46B1B2B6C for <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Aug 2015 22:57:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.3] (unknown [120.149.147.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA2DD22E1F4; Mon, 17 Aug 2015 01:57:20 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
Subject: Re: Request for well-known URI: dnt/
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <153AE32A-7E22-4C7F-853A-D68C10106CC6@gbiv.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 15:57:18 +1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7E76ACA6-A843-40AF-AB72-6FC1BCE7D561@mnot.net>
References: <153AE32A-7E22-4C7F-853A-D68C10106CC6@gbiv.com>
To: Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wellknown-uri-review/6SKYuXi-n1dxxjjZRy9b7eBU-pk>
Cc: Tracking Protection Working Group <public-tracking@w3.org>, wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Well-Known URI review list <wellknown-uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wellknown-uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 05:57:24 -0000
Hi Roy, That's fine, but it should just be "dnt", because: > Registered names MUST conform to the segment-nz production in > [RFC3986]. Cheers, > On 11 Aug 2015, at 9:17 am, Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > This registration is on behalf of the W3C's Tracking Protection WG: > > ==================== > URI suffix: dnt/ > > Change controller: W3C Tracking Protection WG > http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/ > > Specification document(s): > Roy T. Fielding and David Singer, Eds. Tracking Preference Expression (DNT). > W3C Last Call Working Draft, 24 April 2014, Sec. 6.4. > "http://www.w3.org/TR/tracking-dnt/#status-resource" > > Related information: > Includes all resources identified with the path prefix "/.well-known/dnt/" > > ==================== > > Cheers, > > ....Roy -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
- Request for well-known URI: dnt/ Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Request for well-known URI: dnt/ Mark Nottingham
- Re: Request for well-known URI: dnt/ Roy T. Fielding
- Re: Request for well-known URI: dnt/ Mark Nottingham