Re: Request for well-known URI: est

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Sat, 17 August 2013 02:34 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D53E11E81E8 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 19:34:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vNEPFpnHWf3t for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 19:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22AE11E80F9 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 19:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ergon.local (unknown [71.237.13.154]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7593414F7; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 20:37:43 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <520EE13B.4020909@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 20:34:35 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Subject: Re: Request for well-known URI: est
References: <CE32E9BA.1F636%dharkins@arubanetworks.com> <520EAF60.2010509@stpeter.im> <CALaySJKxr1bxqo554zLQN2ttv=KdBoV4qnOnBaCWVXbX1NrRog@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJKxr1bxqo554zLQN2ttv=KdBoV4qnOnBaCWVXbX1NrRog@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Dan Harkins <dharkins@arubanetworks.com>, "<draft-ietf-pkix-est@tools.ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-pkix-est@tools.ietf.org>, "Max Pritikin \(pritikin\)" <pritikin@cisco.com>, "<app-ads@tools.ietf.org>" <app-ads@tools.ietf.org>, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>, "<wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>" <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Well-Known URI review list <wellknown-uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wellknown-uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 02:34:42 -0000

On 8/16/13 8:31 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
>> I'd be happy to raise this issue on the apps-discuss list, unless the
>> application area directors tell me that's not the right place.
> 
> I'm not at all sure what the issue is.
> 
> Is it, "We don't like .well-known [and/or we don't know why we should
> be using it" ?  Or is there something else here?

Previously described:

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wellknown-uri-review/current/msg00087.html

(Sean seems to have cc'd apps-ads@tools.ietf.org instead of
app-ads@tools.ietf.org on the original thread, so perhaps you missed
that message.)

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/