Re: Request for well-known URI: est
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Sat, 17 August 2013 02:39 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D4DA11E81EC for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 19:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.95
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.95 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.028, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aQAaPisVhJUI for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 19:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qe0-x22b.google.com (mail-qe0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F4111E80F9 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 19:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qe0-f43.google.com with SMTP id k5so1598272qej.16 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 19:39:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=6lHcl8P/fSUY9/EMjAaG5gG4ZCTfRkRkH7PUYmu1ptM=; b=sa9DtG7Bm0F0W9GZSuivRjaubr3199COoCwoSLhNyEzZOzwODQWez8qJDhxuyWKjKD zyP7vvJDZXubtLvJe3GkLA5Is0TGpRQskkGq9oMFricvTxByRnHkGtuluFpOgMAIIX6n orZNzSCx9PGO+ld+NMrvduMnkSzIx+ZAS1NA/WoyXSkDqsh6RAbMEIZj0BtrTcX9HvyH BQJoTH8NLempRClOoDEa51/ArpgTzF248VOmrZkj+OxHPU045GmDQe9RSE+YhGvXEZv/ ZIqwiN1far8ucx90q0pnBlxCjQi6J8Qfk91ul5l4jfbv+twFA2vC7485ocGkWp3xD++7 v6/Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.127.196 with SMTP id h4mr6843999qas.59.1376707175412; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 19:39:35 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.224.59.211 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 19:39:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <520EE13B.4020909@stpeter.im>
References: <CE32E9BA.1F636%dharkins@arubanetworks.com> <520EAF60.2010509@stpeter.im> <CALaySJKxr1bxqo554zLQN2ttv=KdBoV4qnOnBaCWVXbX1NrRog@mail.gmail.com> <520EE13B.4020909@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 22:39:35 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Q3PhKqikh9vBEXJlQWkW5-Vp344
Message-ID: <CALaySJJ6XWH8JNok26C5pv7JM-_6hqBHG1aGxDvKZGdh=erkGw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Request for well-known URI: est
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: Dan Harkins <dharkins@arubanetworks.com>, "<draft-ietf-pkix-est@tools.ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-pkix-est@tools.ietf.org>, "Max Pritikin (pritikin)" <pritikin@cisco.com>, "<app-ads@tools.ietf.org>" <app-ads@tools.ietf.org>, Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>, "<wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>" <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Well-Known URI review list <wellknown-uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wellknown-uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 02:39:41 -0000
>>> I'd be happy to raise this issue on the apps-discuss list, unless the >>> application area directors tell me that's not the right place. >> >> I'm not at all sure what the issue is. >> >> Is it, "We don't like .well-known [and/or we don't know why we should >> be using it" ? Or is there something else here? > > Previously described: > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wellknown-uri-review/current/msg00087.html Ah. No, I hadn't seen that. I agree with Mark on the interpretation, and that's the advice I had given to Sean. apps-discuss would be a fine place to chat about that. b
- Request for well-known URI: est Sean Turner
- Re: Request for well-known URI: est Barry Leiba
- Re: Request for well-known URI: est Sean Turner
- Re: Request for well-known URI: est Barry Leiba
- Re: Request for well-known URI: est Max Pritikin (pritikin)
- Re: Request for well-known URI: est Max Pritikin (pritikin)
- Re: Request for well-known URI: est Mark Nottingham
- Re: Request for well-known URI: est Max Pritikin (pritikin)
- Re: Request for well-known URI: est Sean Turner
- Re: Request for well-known URI: est Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Request for well-known URI: est Max Pritikin (pritikin)
- Re: Request for well-known URI: est Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Request for well-known URI: est Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Request for well-known URI: est Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Request for well-known URI: est Barry Leiba
- Re: Request for well-known URI: est Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Request for well-known URI: est Barry Leiba
- Re: Request for well-known URI: est Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Request for well-known URI: est SM
- Re: Request for well-known URI: est Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Request for well-known URI: est SM
- Re: Request for well-known URI: est Sean Turner
- Re: Request for well-known URI: est Mark Nottingham
- Re: Request for well-known URI: est Mark Nottingham