Well known URI registration: "time"
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Wed, 02 December 2015 12:24 UTC
Return-Path: <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
X-Original-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCCEE1A8907 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 04:24:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.799
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_EQ_DK=1.009, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JzxFazeIJIv7 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 04:24:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7B61A88A6 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 04:24:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.55.3]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00834F8A4 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 12:24:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id tB2COoen009244 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 12:24:50 GMT (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
Subject: Well known URI registration: "time"
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <9242.1449059090.1@critter.freebsd.dk>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 12:24:50 +0000
Message-ID: <9243.1449059090@critter.freebsd.dk>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wellknown-uri-review/DkNwR3Bq9Jwyo93RtfF_AXqFk20>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 01:01:35 -0800
X-BeenThere: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Well-Known URI review list <wellknown-uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wellknown-uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 12:24:55 -0000
Hi, We are working on a stop-gap protocol for authenticating timekeeping via HTTPS web-servers for rapid deployment until efforts like NTS etc can get rolled out in the coming years. Since this idea piggybacks on HTTPS the server side is already available, all that is needed is client side software and specifications for use. First cut of a specification is here, while it is being worked on by the NTP-hackers community: http://phk.freebsd.dk/time/20151129.html Once we have filed on it, a IETF draft will be pushed. I kindly ask that IANA allocate a well-known URI for this purpose. It really doesn't matter what it is named, "well-known/time" seems rather obvious, but we'll take anything we can get. Thanks in advance, Poul-Henning Kamp -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
- Well known URI registration: "time" Poul-Henning Kamp
- Re: Well known URI registration: "time" Mark Nottingham