Re: Review requested for the webfinger well-known URI
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 21 March 2013 00:57 UTC
Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 059FD21F8B65 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.266
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.266 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.667, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eo15O+5kxyNC for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:56:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E2D21F8B51 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:56:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.80] (unknown [118.209.42.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F901509B5; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:56:56 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
Subject: Re: Review requested for the webfinger well-known URI
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <053e01ce25cd$659f38a0$30dda9e0$@packetizer.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 11:56:54 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A1CE3A05-AA42-4F42-A2E1-B9C895C596E6@mnot.net>
References: <043401ce195a$0ca69d80$25f3d880$@packetizer.com> <0A3C6B4A-E50F-4501-848C-D71F3E7671E7@mnot.net> <053e01ce25cd$659f38a0$30dda9e0$@packetizer.com>
To: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: 'IANA' <iana@iana.org>, wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Well-Known URI review list <wellknown-uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wellknown-uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 00:57:00 -0000
On 21/03/2013, at 11:45 AM, Paul E. Jones <paulej@packetizer.com> wrote: > Mark, > > Sure. I have to be careful with use of "parameters" as folks get onto me > for using the phrase "query parameter". > > How about this: > "The query to the WebFinger resource will include one or more parameters in > the query string. The representation returned by a WebFinger resource will > be a JSON Resource Descriptor (JRD) as described in Section 4.4 of RFC > XXXX." I'd do it like this: "The query to the WebFinger resource will include one or more parameters in the query string; see Section 4.1 of RFCXXXX. Resources at this location are able to return a JSON Resource Descriptor (JRD) as described in Section 4.4 of RFCXXXX." ... because in theory, you could conneg for a different format down the road. YMMV. Cheers, > > Paul > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Mark Nottingham [mailto:mnot@mnot.net] >> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 9:04 AM >> To: Paul E. Jones >> Cc: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org; IANA >> Subject: Re: Review requested for the webfinger well-known URI >> >> Hi Paul, >> >> Just a suggestion - it might be worth noting in 'related information' >> that the well-known URI can take a query parameter, with a reference to >> section 4.1. >> >> Regardless, request approved. >> >> Cheers, >> >> >> On 04/03/2013, at 11:29 PM, Paul E. Jones <paulej@packetizer.com> wrote: >> >>> Experts, >>> >>> Could you please review the WebFinger draft that proposes the >> introduction of a new well-known URI? >>> >>> The text can be found here: >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-webfinger >>> >>> Your comments would be appreciated. >>> >>> Paul >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> wellknown-uri-review mailing list >>> wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review >> >> -- >> Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > wellknown-uri-review mailing list > wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
- Review requested for the webfinger well-known URI Paul E. Jones
- Re: Review requested for the webfinger well-known… Mark Nottingham
- RE: Review requested for the webfinger well-known… Paul E. Jones
- Re: Review requested for the webfinger well-known… Mark Nottingham
- RE: Review requested for the webfinger well-known… Paul E. Jones