Re: Request for well-known URI: associations.json

Hi again,

our project has evolved a bit.  We would still like to store information
about the relationship between online assets, but the information is going
to be encoded in the form of "statements".  Therefore, we think a more
fitting name would now be:

  .well-known/statements.json

Do we still have your preliminary approval for this new name?

Thanks,
Patrick

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 9:08 PM, Patrick Stahlberg <pstahlb@google.com>
wrote:

> Hi Mark,
>
> Thanks!  We will let you know.
>
> --
> Patrick
>  On Mar 31, 2015 8:52 PM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi Patrick,
>>
>> Sure. Best thing to do is to ping this list once your spec becomes public
>> (even in draft form), and we’ll do the registration.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>
>> > On 1 Apr 2015, at 5:20 am, Patrick Stahlberg <pstahlb@google.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I am writing on behalf of a team at Google working on new ways to
>> surface associations between web sites and other online "assets".  For a
>> planned launch, we would like to register the well-known URI
>> "associations.json" as requested in RFC 5785.
>> >
>> > We would like to ask web site owners to publish a file at this location
>> that follows a simple JSON format and that includes information about other
>> assets that are related to the site on which the associations.json is
>> published.  We plan for the format to be open and usable by anyone.  We
>> would like to publish a full specification of the format once we have
>> enough confidence internally in its design.
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Patrick
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > wellknown-uri-review mailing list
>> > wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review
>>
>> --
>> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>>
>>