IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Wellknown suffix proposal: csp.txt

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Fri, 22 May 2020 03:03 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6A83A0E07 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2020 20:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=BOEg5Tnx; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=NXAURPCG
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7y_9mvsYqge2 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2020 20:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0369C3A08A5 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 May 2020 20:03:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4238AE7; Thu, 21 May 2020 23:03:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 21 May 2020 23:03:45 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=v faD7AUJYX15ZjqDd6kn7JChvGbRYVdIph7TmXDdp6g=; b=BOEg5Tnxc60yoTv1m Bc4sVFV6ySsx8Y//t2tZ6PAk37JRmXNmTn4nUrw68L5qbPFrbyMbTCIAqYAP9okT hYhmYkcU2o3GJMNtfvGb1JZXmuESGNOf63f7I0mAIOeTB3WXAzt1RXMnsw49RfNn EVqfh20bDvKkqPL5RfAz0oGnDeZiKAaTesuB1Cqt4oliTQ9B8Az+H+b9WWCr3nOZ PKcZWXRW/ctmPMxMAg4cxdKAW8/tmgZYLxPO3fe+rqvCQFTUnjKHfFScYccDrwGt hm9LBtPQbN+95bBureBWl9xsOwmz86rShTzBs4hDILEPHoY/uw4/Nxv4hWY204dL AlPWQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=vfaD7AUJYX15ZjqDd6kn7JChvGbRYVdIph7TmXDdp 6g=; b=NXAURPCG+Y8gINLnGuCd8uJdtInc+QQ7S1HNfR8ZJEUgYciIvCYaTUOXm KqGJpRSSwicoHV4vT5e4RlT1CwWUPNMSnpStNz+pRYFEhFW4RiPqn7lyA1C7/CwB 0RwzTR57K0kebAYaWESuWvC+ie1FUSBQMPEVt+s+reLf5JrU2jG3dvirMLxinIza WlLeHLbISTg8vH2YZualEPYroIzN7P9k5jaZmVjCEUw9+mfvFU7fdAkbaxAoae0W HLLDLsPLEJ0ceJCk3+XLXj+BwwADVgbIVdtUqg2aUAbDxsAn4FRSZJsS9cPrYUAW yHOgj5YgIbeSiMbEjcKmbL24XBlaw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:EEHHXrDdZ8TcqjuUzilykjnXAoezqsuvjey0oZPP6i93mYjkmO5ebg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudduvddgieegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqh hmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrkhcupfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehm nhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephfeghfffheffvdefhfelkeetudelhf ejiedtteeikeefhfduueekgeehtdekveevnecuffhomhgrihhnpegtshhpthigthdrohhr ghdpmhhnohhtrdhnvghtnecukfhppeduudelrddujedrudehkedrvdehudenucevlhhush htvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmnhhothesmhhnohht rdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:EEHHXhigmzdP8TyG-ghksLQiml4NS2OEBZeVkG2Gve__L3bKrA5Lrw> <xmx:EEHHXmkSmdwwTL-EcmDfMw3b16KfeDzWVV7oymRM67Zht0akDQmb5w> <xmx:EEHHXtyYZr9eNcAjbP4vf-eKSTtnxfodU40UGpfR8LR-sB8Uuf7kYQ> <xmx:EUHHXrJjTTzLmCGD3v9thPMlrIoPE766e4OhUqHS-XS0aEzNDTWGpA>
Received: from macbook-air.mnot.net (119-17-158-251.77119e.mel.static.aussiebb.net [119.17.158.251]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 17AF630664A3; Thu, 21 May 2020 23:03:43 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Subject: Re: Wellknown suffix proposal: csp.txt
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAGHJ3LnAWUE6S36kR_Z5L7Zq9YezuTYQriBmXOX9DNzVYbrwCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 13:03:41 +1000
Cc: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A940B5C7-F837-4DD3-ABE1-33997CA6B4E7@mnot.net>
References: <CAGHJ3LnuX97y+_2at=hLc43HvZzw_LKJRnwADGZB1J4hTksEEA@mail.gmail.com> <92C71FFA-37E8-451B-838B-AB9387CCD23E@mnot.net> <CAGHJ3LnAWUE6S36kR_Z5L7Zq9YezuTYQriBmXOX9DNzVYbrwCQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: hiburn 8 <daniel@hiburn8.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wellknown-uri-review/sq28sT3Qayi4cApLa68NB9ALYAk>
X-BeenThere: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Well-Known URI review list <wellknown-uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wellknown-uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 03:03:50 -0000


> On 22 May 2020, at 12:58 pm, hiburn 8 <daniel@hiburn8.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Mark.
> Thanks for the quick reply.
> 
> I did intend on creating an organisational page and registered csptxt.org in its place, leave it with me and i'll resubmit with a URI. Will that be acceptable? I could look into starting an RFC, but i have no experience with this. 

A web page run by a single person isn't ideal.

> It has not yet been ran by the W3C WebAppSec Working Group (I am not actually a member). Do you suggest I register and seek a consensus?

I highly recommend it. Again, I don't think we can register "csp.txt" without their buy-in.

Cheers,


--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email