Re: Closing the queue
Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> Fri, 30 July 2021 23:02 UTC
Return-Path: <jay@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDEEF3A1556 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UMP33E9VcAqp; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [158.140.230.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D7BF3A1539; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:01:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <2EF85235-4EA3-43FF-848A-17ADF57B26BA@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2E078A5A-448B-42CB-BB93-93A343712A0C"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
Subject: Re: Closing the queue
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 11:01:52 +1200
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-eS_MtnkKuGpkvLM0nwobQ7hryO4mEnMh4pcbZhvAgsQw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>, WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <CAFU7BAT5Nv4vu0R9cVowK_vunHRuA86jQqdbjtLvQ5x6zuwN7g@mail.gmail.com> <124013E8-300D-4CD4-9E36-9D166716BFE0@gmail.com> <CAFU7BAS7AtgCgDjJe0iFvOtr94eRfLmMjmQgHnQUSS3OYKLx1w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-eS_MtnkKuGpkvLM0nwobQ7hryO4mEnMh4pcbZhvAgsQw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/0qDJNk0XdyNfyDawy0-mTBJyZvc>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 23:02:09 -0000
> On 31/07/2021, at 10:56 AM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 5:25 PM Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com <mailto:furry13@gmail.com>> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 6:33 AM Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > I would suggest that one say “I’m closing the queue after <nam>”, and have a way to tell meet echo that it should stop putting new people in the queue. > > Actually I'd say that "hard lock" might be suboptimal - sometimes we > might still want people joining after the queue is closed as an > exception - like an AD making comments etc. In real life even after > the queue is closed people still can jump to the mic to respond to > comments etc. > > I've been wrong before, but I THOUGHT sending audio and/or video was also on the honor system - I think I've been able to turn on at least audio and break in for at least comments before the session starts, without queuing. Am I missing something? Yes it is an honour system. Meetecho tried a permissions system and nobody liked it. Jay > > Best, > > Spencer > > Personally I'd be very happy if I can click on "closing the queue in > 15 secs" and the queue section goes, for example, orange and the > title says "QUEUE: CLOSING". After 15 sec it goes red(*) and marked as > CLOSED. > As a result it's clearly visible for the participants that it's closed > and for the chairs that they need to re-open before/during the next > talk, white there is still possible to join it. > > (*) color examples are chosen randomly and might not accommodate > color-blind cases. > > > Sent from my iPad > > > > > On Jul 29, 2021, at 6:58 PM, Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com <mailto:furry13@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > > While I'm very happy with Meetecho (wow, I've just managed to chair a > > > session single-handed!), there is one missing feature which would make > > > me very happy. > > > > > > Wouldn't it be great if we have a button to mark the queue "closed"? > > > It might be just me but I really, really hate interrupting people just > > > to say "I'm closing the queue after". Having smth like "The queue will > > > be closed in 5..4..3..2..1" would be even better.. > > > > > > Is there anyone else missing this feature? Or I'm just not aware of > > > the best current practices in keeping the session on time? > > > > > > -- > > > SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry > > > > > > > -- > SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry > -- Jay Daley IETF Executive Director jay@ietf.org
- Closing the queue Jen Linkova
- Re: Closing the queue tjw ietf
- Re: Closing the queue Bob Hinden
- Re: Closing the queue Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [irsg] Closing the queue Carsten Bormann
- Re: [irsg] Closing the queue Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Closing the queue Fred Baker
- Re: Closing the queue Jen Linkova
- Re: Closing the queue Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Closing the queue Jay Daley
- Re: Closing the queue Carsten Bormann
- Re: Closing the queue Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: Closing the queue Jen Linkova