Re: Setting Reply-To
Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com> Wed, 28 October 2020 16:00 UTC
Return-Path: <derek@ihtfp.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534CF3A05A6; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 09:00:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ihtfp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N40G1TXsAcZM; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 09:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org (MAIL2.IHTFP.ORG [204.107.200.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 213893A044A; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 09:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA962E2042; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 12:00:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.ihtfp.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29559-04; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 12:00:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id DB8E1E2040; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 12:00:37 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ihtfp.com; s=default; t=1603900837; bh=j+wNQ2iSHsr4IGPyRPs7X2T5BKSfigpN4GrFQGOo8sw=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Date:Subject:From:To:Cc; b=LCo1eSyTQI5HmMPVgCLpuWZpO8nSndkkecxAVQNcyunLN+p03SU/rXrUIJFUi7JlD XPyXXMbU/jenqMXgb/JnO8kuxsJP3uGTyfTAqwwyIRWYdQRFLxFRnKPy+tfPzem55m dtXLodv2kmNKNIEm+O8MIhf24rR9obYv2gdL+sbI=
Received: from 192.168.248.158 (SquirrelMail authenticated user warlord) by mail2.ihtfp.org with HTTP; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 12:00:37 -0400
Message-ID: <de508f23f6ae0b8557f5371d5cd78234.squirrel@mail2.ihtfp.org>
In-Reply-To: <12c95563-8f0e-736f-d15b-61307c42e681@nostrum.com>
References: <20201026181442.GA2438@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAMm+LwiVmE=qtSPCMD-3foPODL8bgETj3dQDKS-3BOM2021dEg@mail.gmail.com> <CADaq8jdSeTDWy_0fCV25ykxKFMV1ZBtUMMNesoOuaXCzFVfpOA@mail.gmail.com> <D2D0455D-8D6C-4A19-ACAE-4DD972D83DC1@bluepopcorn.net> <7caa5bed-febc-dc71-ec0f-b4d4e951e01a@nostrum.com> <380F930D-96CA-4868-9001-5DC6C1157AA5@tzi.org> <12c95563-8f0e-736f-d15b-61307c42e681@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 12:00:37 -0400
Subject: Re: Setting Reply-To
From: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
To: "tools-discuss@ietf.org" <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Working Group Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, rsoc@iab.org, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22-14.fc20
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2a
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/2FbaDKW270GKJjYmhmUr5MBYbzg>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 16:00:42 -0000
My received version has this header: Reply-To: "tools-discuss@ietf.org" <tools-discuss@ietf.org> I did "Reply-All" -derek On Wed, October 28, 2020 11:49 am, Robert Sparks wrote: > I haven't run into that. I'm going to try to redirect this particular > subthread to tools-discuss, with a Reply-To, and I'll go looking for > where such stripping might take place. > > RjS > > On 10/28/20 10:31 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote: >> One little problem with executing on this is that the IETF mailing list >> software seems to swallow Reply-To. So there is no way to move comments >> to a message to a specific mailing list. >> >> Attempts to do such a move without the aid of reply-to usually don’t >> work (they just add more fragmentation to the discussion). >> >> Grüße, Carsten >> > > -- Derek Atkins 617-623-3745 derek@ihtfp.com www.ihtfp.com Computer and Internet Security Consultant
- Re: [rfc-i] Jim: Re: FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Jim: Re: [rfc-i] FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page … Mark Andrews
- FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty pleas… Toerless Eckert
- Re: FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty p… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty p… David Noveck
- Re: FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty p… Jim Fenton
- Re: FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty p… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty p… Jim Fenton
- Re: FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty p… David Noveck
- Re: FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (pretty p… Robert Sparks
- Re: [rfc-i] FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page numbers (… Carsten Bormann
- Setting Reply-To Robert Sparks
- Re: Setting Reply-To Derek Atkins
- Jim: Re: [rfc-i] FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page numb… Toerless Eckert
- Re: Jim: Re: [rfc-i] FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page … John C Klensin
- Re: Jim: Re: [rfc-i] FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page … Warren Kumari
- Re: Jim: Re: [rfc-i] FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page … Mark Andrews
- Re: Jim: Re: [rfc-i] FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page … Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [rfc-i] Jim: Re: FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page … Michael Richardson
- Re: [rfc-i] Jim: Re: FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page … Larry Masinter
- Re: Jim: Re: [rfc-i] FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page … Donald Eastlake
- Re: Jim: Re: [rfc-i] FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page … Leonard Giuliano
- Re: Jim: Re: [rfc-i] FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page … Christian Huitema
- Re: [rfc-i] Jim: Re: FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page … Toerless Eckert
- RE: Jim: Re: [rfc-i] FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page … Black, David
- Re: [irsg] Jim: Re: [rfc-i] FIXED: Poll: RFCs wit… Jane Coffin
- RE: [irsg] Jim: Re: [rfc-i] FIXED: Poll: RFCs wit… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [rfc-i] Jim: Re: FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page … John C Klensin
- Re: [rfc-i] Jim: Re: FIXED: Poll: RFCs with page … Larry Masinter
- Re: [Rsoc] [rfc-i] RFCs with page numbers (pretty… John R. Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] [Rsoc] RFCs with page numbers (pretty… Brian E Carpenter