IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: protocol design tenets?

Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 18 February 2020 21:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B5B120819 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:18:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.368
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.368 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P7bOWwAmDL3q for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:18:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x331.google.com (mail-ot1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::331]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 092B21200C7 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:18:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x331.google.com with SMTP id r27so20961814otc.8 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:18:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=oyQyHHDlQPOpv6dB7zpBzu+hPoP68wxG0bo1/WgBCJ8=; b=rUYQ78CTAWJZlFIIPDpoBekDs6P0b7D+WWihHf+WTlPAIbOemzJVMeAMgzLMQ3Hoeo uPyLMZyDB3j6FfSMCYprZmYx4qNtqe5kzLbcGXKx8BTD4YXbp2lAqF1tyD/1tKbY8KuG IK4f6fgXDTAGRmx8HbnOrQHpt//7ynwIcXJdmFe4hGe0BGMGSbMb+1N+oLfQQ5nlrCXk hvObY9gHzYFxxrRsQ6SWcidq5bPyyXSp1kjqfdIYxflME47LHkOMD5B/qHtG1SQqZvd+ Muz7k1Z2cU6lp/rivWwotH+59dcPPcueX4v6NLvgLXJgLLMDkWIxWqqI8BIRtowLLRCT YrvA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oyQyHHDlQPOpv6dB7zpBzu+hPoP68wxG0bo1/WgBCJ8=; b=jLBS24jJ1d5aQRLUO+QPtAPCzkraj6lj0QN2+SHLO5i7JWGvHidYO2DzXgTs+iq5dw fCMblCx2wALc3V2F8nwYXVTF+r77MyL8wXL1pO8gIUJpu/aZgEcscL3ONByigO2eLgR6 frph6dzH2fPcI0G5nmZtJ2ery/0YuoBKgTqWzwGVlXPa6eofoP5nHOfWXmuS+bLixE9N 2+Gfd409Mmxpjm27vwFxiSASQ0fuR51A+y4FB0p5W2rbMO/wmm1FWxFjGsh5BjXUs5nG gmUWRW5OdJeqt/Dzxe2nazu+BkZ1OVibZ/5xOfFufxz+IFqHviRdyRtSxZv6epzbDavy rYaw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWyJMC8cIQ/OkkHgqXzjmtbTiimb4npQKcELRWChpbn7lC0hHWj g3xyVomAEYgm5ivHQsDF4v5sIpTfIEMB5Og6Qyg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzPPo35qaSFDM3L6bosiOf4graOs6KzOeyTE/95R/srPLmjQD/7mwVJYuIUUHDlWuUbssNe9pdOIN1+184mqhI=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1149:: with SMTP id x9mr17670187otq.156.1582060683279; Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:18:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAD9ie-uFzjH6vsz9jD4REVEoE06aGi_dn46z=PrPuLHrxXY-4g@mail.gmail.com> <A5ED8F35-F520-4229-9241-5EF6598C6611@gmail.com> <CAD9ie-tMgZC-64G54jC1o=1FuNexb_uLxfP6FYxc8B-_RZeZFw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAD9ie-tMgZC-64G54jC1o=1FuNexb_uLxfP6FYxc8B-_RZeZFw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:17:52 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMGpriWH8Rx74J4gaOStRVBEi7=7=kYHEt3VJMHkbqGiUxJ2dw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: protocol design tenets?
To: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
Cc: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>, bernard.aboba@gmail.com, wgchairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000a41b9059ee03544"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/2MSjjkIFiCSpiWJbmKWBigQazP0>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 21:18:06 -0000

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3439 perhaps.

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:48 PM Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks!
>
> 5218 is interesting, but https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1958 was more
> what I was looking for, specifically section 3 & 4.
>
> Anything else similar to 1918? Are the design guidelines still applicable?
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:33 PM Suresh Krishnan <
> suresh.krishnan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Getting a bit old but still excellent
>>
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5218
>>
>> Cheers
>> Suresh
>>
>> On Feb 18, 2020, at 3:28 PM, Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone have any pointers to protocol design tenets / best practices
>> / principles?
>>
>>
>>
>> /Dick
>> ᐧ
>>
>>
>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email