IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Terms in RFC 2418

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Mon, 13 September 2021 19:38 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D994D3A1762 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 12:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z_Hq4ymam-nk for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 12:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-f44.google.com (mail-vs1-f44.google.com [209.85.217.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F8513A1764 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 12:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-f44.google.com with SMTP id s15so9531653vst.13 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 12:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=01Mf08UFIaAmU2YT9BacPZlkrrQ8I1Rz4pDIY2FRNXE=; b=vYpIgPDyyTgX9s0nSR17OBTG05GBngpIuruM2zDcmAU5sD3cREroYbdn4ac2DphvTe KqLWCgMqKRnCk6SLVUC8iweFBATTtn91S86dYv3E6P2nuKldfPOOQ8UbnsnE1ZbRJ58F a7zwwPc4QOsWRZJXnhiJ2vO88DS+9aNrq2c/k68grW6av8Uw4RO9CPRdQRG+NCszfxo9 88YzzYqMVYp96pt4uIAV7jb5Zo3KcTEf1qVR+IncVqS4V0ZP88wnR1F6cC1QQzk+ztxW gK2yvdx3HYAy8owH0B0e2nq418l/o9mrwCgeiwWdafi/dyXeR//nK+ot6VvlOkb9+Wf8 aUWQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533dMmTy2atr3yGHfV7zb4BzQCTNjGM/KZR6e44rXkHLimgfVA9q EEKQl33wUg1Cu0x/lhpLB0ZZrWyS/n9AKTjPxerM1NTY
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwYWRl5+BmnMROtvhgGzroHbxNTsuktC0dlkaLCKtQ0oo9xKZtnqJTmzRvfQqNis043pM+bKzlvPFOTORlxJv8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:3a72:: with SMTP id bf18mr6664459vsb.18.1631561879165; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 12:37:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <A11B9A3B-E30D-416C-AC1A-4E2EB046C003@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <A11B9A3B-E30D-416C-AC1A-4E2EB046C003@akamai.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 15:37:48 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJL9BFj1zniqqB5r5rTg0+YMcafPD38TXm1+_Dk=NYCN3w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Terms in RFC 2418
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/3B0vo7JExyC0JwPqgNT1odtK9Mk>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 19:38:03 -0000

> I was looking at RFC 2418 and I have some questions. If you know of any working groups that have deployed a “Working Group Consultant”[1]
>
> Or a “WG Facilitator” [2] in the past decade, please let me know.

I'm not aware of "Facilitator" being used, but working groups do
occasionally have a "Consultant" role, which shows up in the
datatracker as "Tech Advisors".  Anima, Mboned, and Mops, at least,
currently have some.

Barry

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status