Re: WG meeting structure

[Toerless Eckert <[e-mail]>]

I do right now think there would be downsides for my WG with this
setup, but i would like to encourage my WG to evaluate and chime in (i
know MichaelR seems to like it), and i would certainly try to go to
WG meetings where this is being attempted at 105 to gain actual
experience.

Please send a reminder to this list which WGs will use this 
if the experiment is happening.

Cheers
    Toerless

On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 09:14:44AM -0500, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 08:37:49PM +0800, Loa Andersson wrote:
> > All,
> > 
> > I agree with most of what what Fred says, drawing on experience from
> > other wg's.
> > 
> > I'm a bit nervous when this type discussions pops up. As long they are
> > discussions on "good ideas we tried, and the results we had", I think it
> > is fine.
> > 
> > When they slide away to instruct wg chairs what they should do, I'm
> > very concerned.
> > 
> > I'm convinced that when it comes to IETF wg's we don't have and will
> > never have a seating arrangement that fit all wg's, nor fit a single
> > working group for all of its life time.
> > 
> > If there are experiments necessary, let the wg chairs do the experiments
> > and the evaluation of the experiments.
> 
> There's a bit of a threshold problem, in that the logistics of the chair
> setup means we need some critical mass of WGs to agree to run the same
> experiment in the same meeting cycle in order for any of them to happen.
> But that shouldn't have to take much else away from the WG chairs' control
> over how to run the WG.
> 
> -Ben

-- 
---
[e-mail]