Re: Draft "Convince your boss" note for IETF participants

Leif Johansson <> Wed, 28 September 2022 15:18 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A86A8C15257C for <>; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 08:18:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y5imOqePyZCn for <>; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 08:18:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EF6DC14CF02 for <>; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 08:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id l12so14701267ljg.9 for <>; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 08:18:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=ThV7BUCFfYoi8475826q/tdKwDwEmTiQo8Ux6cf7EzY=; b=C26MpnUz4IdgRy6hM+6AmNa0rsMGhlYnDqgPSR4rFXjZHWmGGBt1kfuPx5GOgwudct JVOwkqg6RnAWTjls5lv+CXD95sm9phEUdsNv6vMQP7OGxAMFnUj5BZIG0yeulYaYUhYA D+P8Q5IqMALKyOE8YjQu62zzeW8/evc9trMaNKHApnKVhwl8XoBlNDai2wAWJg9A6MaR hhTZDK3cVqDjEdzr9th2oonvFY7i+hax+v/RxM4RLRK5tHGHNNUUfMgxQUwr51tJ5ZEb ATBb+Td9XwqVg2zq9PTgt4V4rewlnUjSTPeKguJ9tOYdgvRiYJAe5E4K3F/aRMsxGNnS do4A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=ThV7BUCFfYoi8475826q/tdKwDwEmTiQo8Ux6cf7EzY=; b=2sQQx2BnElcEWc++xsqSOWjYzxW8EwAj958QlG33GOVxH2aqhple+20S0W5p4NQaQz 8kjRsm6PWVjerFsrbDkmMXgt4sfztbckB2IbsbbXnOXgbxkfhGpE3qO1pBTkTrM8Mapt +4IxabSW24NPZ8D7ukEzWp6btvJUy7r9rsgzCOx2CrvawlcLlnCRKwO3qia5tA7g/VH4 6XXRfZFzfhP3BX1usrgwvYxb9VqawP70Hp7ujvzyu2SgWVGEjbkiCGkA6Puet8uQK412 qLhm3JwahQUcUgKfyqNt01u/dtLx3uQWzja4fgM1upvchm+mDDi3pD+KgTE7vxxPK9DE QH/Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf39jQWMZPzafWoz6ipNX0NQwugyLpimfE6jdJtB7xBYQ6h6Ufcm NYXyyoW6B3EZTrab5KpfCDwppGIbXzDWOA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM50D1+I5d4tdnuv15YMI4W0xHZvyG8OR4BTn3R9x0XHTYjKsRwvROZnRR000MwyLx3p6+NnFg==
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a9a9:0:b0:26c:6ec5:290 with SMTP id x41-20020a2ea9a9000000b0026c6ec50290mr11249853ljq.186.1664378306916; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 08:18:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPV6:2001:6b0:7:c:80fb:5e2e:f046:3a61? ([2001:6b0:7:c:80fb:5e2e:f046:3a61]) by with ESMTPSA id p2-20020a05651212c200b004946aef1814sm498501lfg.137.2022. for <> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Sep 2022 08:18:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 17:18:25 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Subject: Re: Draft "Convince your boss" note for IETF participants
Content-Language: en-US
References: <>
From: Leif Johansson <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 15:18:34 -0000

On 2022-09-28 16:22, Greg Wood wrote:
> Hello!
> As an experiment, based on material some other technology conferences provide to (potential) participants, and at the suggestion received from an IETFer, we’ve created a draft “Convince Your Boss” note that might be used by someone seeking approval to attend an IETF meeting in-person:
> Any and all comments about whether this might be useful to you or participants in your groups, or suggestions about how it might be tuned to be more useful, would be most welcome — either on this list or directly to me.
> More broadly, it would be useful to know whether there is any specific information or material that would make it easier for IETF participants to participate in the IETF—not just meetings, but also (for example) devoting time to work in the IETF. Again, I’m happy to receive suggestions directly or on the list.
> Please let me know if I can provide more information or answer any questions.

Quick q - in which industry do you envision the hypothetical employee works? Vendor, operator, general tech industry?

	Cheers Leif