IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Holding an action

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Fri, 14 May 2021 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E8F3A3743 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 May 2021 09:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.08
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.08 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id In7xpMfWw_nq for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 May 2021 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F1093A3722 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 May 2021 09:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unformal.localdomain ([47.186.1.92]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 14EG22Y5015549 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 May 2021 11:02:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1621008122; bh=INs7DOXrbVX1CHYkp9P1a5JMVli/M7nDzk/y9yErBRM=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=TbdAoEpLh7dDYQFY9DbAiWE3wbNYREPknnAOCPeyO/SpUrkVOxrMI5b2ZhN+eGZ8k zOmHX/w5LHle/7nFA+bX+VcIP+2Vkfrk62pfsNnt4yAB23X/72cis5oFpSno8EVm6V jWWAnS2zfZ8WfOxnMOp5zGgRVBA8JYercrpEuZZc=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.1.92] claimed to be unformal.localdomain
Subject: Re: Holding an action
To: wgchairs@ietf.org
References: <5FDD7FD3-FC0F-DD41-9F1A-48930BBBF22D@hxcore.ol> <6.2.5.6.2.20210514020559.0eeeefa0@elandnews.com> <2E02B592-557A-9F48-BB26-8836ED0A08CD@hxcore.ol> <CALaySJK0+JEG35cSqJjYq0V97pVym2kag-sLjtnfn5WNty+POw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <cc476ef9-89de-b1fb-74dc-f4e438cdd9e9@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 11:01:56 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJK0+JEG35cSqJjYq0V97pVym2kag-sLjtnfn5WNty+POw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/5nkf1gC7M5YfqX8xr5Tvx_3b_5o>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 16:02:10 -0000

I think there is a bug in the new code that should remove the authors as 
action holders when a new revision is submitted.

I just created https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ietfdb/ticket/3281

The relevant code starts here:

https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ietfdb/browser/trunk/ietf/doc/utils.py#L469

RjS

On 5/14/21 8:07 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
> We discussed that quite a bit while I was on the IESG recently, and
> also discussed it with the tools team.  In the end, we decided that it
> can't, in general, be done automatically, and the best approach is
> that if one needs to remember what the action is, one should
> (manually) put a comment in the datatracker as a reminder (which I
> often did as AD, and which I will do as WGC when I need to).
>
> Barry
>
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 5:19 AM Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yes, and I know that. My point is: there is no use telling people that they have an action without telling them what it is.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/14/21, 12:12, "S Moonesamy" <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Yaron,
>>
>> At 02:01 AM 14-05-2021, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
>>
>>> As a co-author, I am marked as an "action
>>> holder" with a bright red "for 35 days" on my draft [1].
>>
>>
>> There is a "discuss" from one of the Security
>>
>> Area Directors.  The usual practice in such cases
>>
>> is to discuss the "discuss" with the Area Director.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> S. Moonesamy
>>
>>
>>
>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email