Pointing only to what's relevant for a group (was Re: IETF wiki expectations)
Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Wed, 23 November 2022 14:40 UTC
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6274C14F734 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 06:40:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.676
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.676 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2Czrd_w5SI3z for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 06:40:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7729C14F735 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 06:40:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([47.186.48.51]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPSA id 2ANEe3c7065680 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:40:03 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1669214404; bh=HokUmAYforOFqnZ8XMex2RdPxMyl0ndPPAgF2bD3kSw=; h=Date:To:Cc:References:From:Subject:In-Reply-To; b=D9W1m3tBBNPGOV7b4XHKhHdkLf44xy3sUWHP8jhdx+kIykBNrZbR04HsG6HrjMWlm Xgne8UWtpYZcYmCAzPbLq7/knGGEzj/pnXdIThq5JofBnuyHrUtGCBvZYAbAdwGOsC ++mbcfF3DvQTDxcKN0Gc+/RWKI5HiWLrGEET8Gas=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.48.51] claimed to be [192.168.1.102]
Message-ID: <41479932-c5c4-165c-3aa5-26c75530408d@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:39:58 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot=40mnot.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>
Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org
References: <B7FD0738-12DB-468B-A6E6-C28E333D2C3E@heapingbits.net> <17BC73EA-6A5C-4C8C-94CD-0E3ABAC8B405@mnot.net>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Subject: Pointing only to what's relevant for a group (was Re: IETF wiki expectations)
In-Reply-To: <17BC73EA-6A5C-4C8C-94CD-0E3ABAC8B405@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/5vN0FXQyWNsTDfKsSHeljhS3DG4>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 14:40:12 -0000
On 11/22/22 10:52 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > if a WG isn't actively using a particular facility / service, it shouldn't show up as an option for others to wonder about. Please be specific. We've been working away the hard-coded places that might lead to a dangle - the group About page, for example, shouldn't have any of these left. What groups may have left configured in their External Resources could still be pointing into something unused - is that what you're calling out? If you're thinking about removing confusion on other viewss, please call them out (preferably as gh issues). RjS
- IETF wiki expectations Christopher Wood
- Re: IETF wiki expectations Michael Richardson
- Re: IETF wiki expectations Salz, Rich
- Re: IETF wiki expectations Toerless Eckert
- Re: IETF wiki expectations Jay Daley
- Re: IETF wiki expectations Salz, Rich
- Re: IETF wiki expectations Jim Fenton
- Re: IETF wiki expectations Carsten Bormann
- Re: IETF wiki expectations Joel Halpern
- Re: IETF wiki expectations Mark Nottingham
- Pointing only to what's relevant for a group (was… Robert Sparks
- Re: Pointing only to what's relevant for a group … Mark Nottingham